2018
DOI: 10.5334/irsp.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that Social Comparison with the Thin Ideal Affects Implicit Self-Evaluation

Abstract: Research on body image suggests that social comparison with the thin ideal has a number of negative consequences for women. To date, however, little is known on how social comparison with the thin ideal affects the accessibility of positive thoughts and feelings about the self (implicit self-liking). To examine this issue, one hundred and twenty-six young women from two countries, Canada and France, were exposed either to fourteen photographs of the thin ideal or to the same images airbrushed to make the model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(S2.P6)As predicted in Lefebvre’s representational space, the above quotations demonstrate both upward and downward comparisons within VS. Despite presenting idealized images of their self on SNSs, and being aware of this fact, this does not protect them from upwardly located targets, whom they compare themselves to in an immediate and often automatic fashion (Bocage-Barthelemy et al, 2018). This not only serves to devalue self-esteem/self-evaluations (Vogel et al, 2014), but also creates and maintains an incongruence between their real-self and ideal-self (Rogers, 1961).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(S2.P6)As predicted in Lefebvre’s representational space, the above quotations demonstrate both upward and downward comparisons within VS. Despite presenting idealized images of their self on SNSs, and being aware of this fact, this does not protect them from upwardly located targets, whom they compare themselves to in an immediate and often automatic fashion (Bocage-Barthelemy et al, 2018). This not only serves to devalue self-esteem/self-evaluations (Vogel et al, 2014), but also creates and maintains an incongruence between their real-self and ideal-self (Rogers, 1961).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is difficult for respondents to escape comparison. Even when they declare that they do not compare themselves to others, they almost automatically do so when confronted with images (Bocage- Barthélémy et al, 2018). This illustrates the power of comparison effects.…”
Section: Discussion and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In broad terms, social comparison refers to thinking about the self in relationship to others (Garcia et al., 2013; Križan & Gibbons, 2014; Suls & Wheeler, 2017). Social comparisons are pervasive in daily life (Summerville & Roese, 2008; Wheeler & Miyake, 1992), and sometimes occur with little conscious awareness or control (Bocage‐Barthélémy et al., 2018; Gilbert et al., 1995). There are two core distinctions in the social comparison literature.…”
Section: Big‐fish‐little‐pond Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%