2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that the antiproliferative effects of auranofin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae arise from inhibition of mitochondrial respiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with Gamberi's et al (2015) results in that mitochondrial function appears to be a target of auranofin. It should be noted that Gamberi et al used haploid deletion strains sensitivity, which generally does not inform on the direct target of a compound as opposed to the heterozygous deletion strains used in our study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results are in agreement with Gamberi's et al (2015) results in that mitochondrial function appears to be a target of auranofin. It should be noted that Gamberi et al used haploid deletion strains sensitivity, which generally does not inform on the direct target of a compound as opposed to the heterozygous deletion strains used in our study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, genes ( rad18 Δ and nsi1 Δ) involved in chromatin function were found to not be affected possibly because of the concentration used in our validation studies or because they may be false positives from the profiling data. Our results are in agreement with Gamberi et al (2015) indicating the mitochondrial protein(s) is the potential target of auranofin. We further confirmed the three heterozygous deletion strains ( mia40 Δ, acn9 Δ, and coa4 Δ) were sensitive to auranofin when grown in YPD liquid medium with auranofin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After 24 hours of incubation, yeast growth was monitored using a spectrophotometer (OD 600 ) and the results were expressed as percent growth rate for each strain compared to the untreated control group, as described elsewhere [37]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%