2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291712000700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that the wider social environment moderates the association between familial liability and psychosis spectrum outcome

Abstract: Contextual effects may be important in moderating the expression of psychosis liability in populations, representing a specific pathway independent of the link between common mental disorder and psychosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most deprived neighbourhoods in the study had greater than double the rate of psychosis compared to the least deprived neighbourhoods (incidence rate ratio: 2.11; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.34, 3.32), after accounting for individual confounders that included ethnicity and occupational socioeconomic status. Secondly, neighbourhood variation in UHR would accord with emerging evidence that neighbourhood variation predicts general population sub-clinical psychotic experiences ( Binbay et al, 2012 , Das-Munshi et al, 2012 , Schofield et al, 2016 ). Explanatory factors for this association include ethnic density ( Boydell et al, 2001 ), social fragmentation ( Kirkbride et al, 2008 , Kirkbride et al, 2012 ), and neighbourhood deprivation ( Bhavsar et al, 2014 , O'Donoghue et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The most deprived neighbourhoods in the study had greater than double the rate of psychosis compared to the least deprived neighbourhoods (incidence rate ratio: 2.11; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.34, 3.32), after accounting for individual confounders that included ethnicity and occupational socioeconomic status. Secondly, neighbourhood variation in UHR would accord with emerging evidence that neighbourhood variation predicts general population sub-clinical psychotic experiences ( Binbay et al, 2012 , Das-Munshi et al, 2012 , Schofield et al, 2016 ). Explanatory factors for this association include ethnic density ( Boydell et al, 2001 ), social fragmentation ( Kirkbride et al, 2008 , Kirkbride et al, 2012 ), and neighbourhood deprivation ( Bhavsar et al, 2014 , O'Donoghue et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…46 A comparison of informal social control in neighborhoods in Turkish and Dutch cities showed informal social control was higher in Turkish cities than in Dutch cities. 47 Therefore, it would be expected that in Turkish adolescents, informal social control would be positively associated with PAP. However, this was not observed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, factors in the wider social environment, such as neighborhood-level risk factors, were not included, and studies were not genetically sensitive, with a few notable exceptions (4446). There is robust evidence that genetic and socioenvironmental factors, both at the individual and the neighborhood levels, interact with each other in the development and course of the psychosis spectrum (47, 48). To study gene-environment interactions when analyzing the development and course of the extended and transdiagnostic psychosis phenotype, simultaneous assessments of the genetic and the environmental factors both at the individual level and at the level of the wider social environment are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%