2014
DOI: 10.1080/0048721x.2014.903649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidencing superdiversity in the census and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous paper, therefore, I asked whether it was possible to find some element of the census data that could allow us to identify particular neighbourhoods as religiously superdiverse, and so enabling a comparative analysis, testing my hypothesis from Handsworth in other equally superdiverse neighbourhoods (Stringer, 2014). My conclusion was that this was only partially possible because of the lack of detail within the census material, especially in the area of religion, but that a combination of religious, ethnic and national origin data could perhaps help to identify areas that were potentially superdiverse.…”
Section: Superdiversity In Handsworthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous paper, therefore, I asked whether it was possible to find some element of the census data that could allow us to identify particular neighbourhoods as religiously superdiverse, and so enabling a comparative analysis, testing my hypothesis from Handsworth in other equally superdiverse neighbourhoods (Stringer, 2014). My conclusion was that this was only partially possible because of the lack of detail within the census material, especially in the area of religion, but that a combination of religious, ethnic and national origin data could perhaps help to identify areas that were potentially superdiverse.…”
Section: Superdiversity In Handsworthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of both the question on ethnicity and particularly that on religion, the number of choices available does not fully reflect the level of diversity that might be apparent on the ground. The issues relating to the religion question have been rehearsed many times, but by offering the choice of the "big six" and then a self designated "other" category, there are many elements of contemporary religious diversity that are missed (Stringer, 2014). We cannot divide the main religious categories, to measure Catholics as opposed to Baptists for example, and the question did not allow individuals to choose more than one option, so failing to recognise those who consider themselves to be both Christian and Buddhist or Pagan and Hindu, or whatever.…”
Section: Testing the Diversity Of Diversitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He argues that the value of census data lies in the possibility of triangulating them with other methods and particularly highlights the need to combine qualitative and quantitative methods. Only then, his work suggests, can we identify and distinguish between different modes of diversity and the lived experience of these environments (Stringer 2014).…”
Section: Religious Identification and Complex Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin Stringer (2014) also engages with issues of diversity, taking a more cautious view of what census data can tell us. His concern is with qualitative differences between diversity and superdiversity (the extent to which some places have an intense concentration of people from different migrant backgrounds) and with the extent to which census data can distinguish between pluralist and divided neighbourhoods -neighbourhoods that are equally but very differently heterogeneous.…”
Section: Religious Identification and Complex Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%