2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidential estimation of event locations in microblogs using the Dempster–Shafer theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, few users use geotagging (e.g., due to privacy issues) (Schulz et al, 2013), which reduces greatly the impact of supervised learning WD methods. Some recent studies adopt hybrid approaches, combining: WD and FN (e.g, (Rahimi et al, 2015;Bakerman et al, 2018)); WD and features derived from user account Metadata (MD) (Ozdikis et al, 2016;Dredze et al, 2013;Schulz et al, 2013); and WD, FN and MD (Williams et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, few users use geotagging (e.g., due to privacy issues) (Schulz et al, 2013), which reduces greatly the impact of supervised learning WD methods. Some recent studies adopt hybrid approaches, combining: WD and FN (e.g, (Rahimi et al, 2015;Bakerman et al, 2018)); WD and features derived from user account Metadata (MD) (Ozdikis et al, 2016;Dredze et al, 2013;Schulz et al, 2013); and WD, FN and MD (Williams et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with several state-of-the-art works (e.g., Celik & Dokuz, 2018;Do et al, 2018;Huang & Carley, 2019;Paule et al, 2019;Ozdikis et al, 2019), a pure unsupervised WD approach is adopted and thus no geographic labeled data (e.g., tweets or user location profiles) is required, only historical tweet nouns and GT data. Moreover, we do not use LIW, as adopted in (Ozdikis et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2017;Bakerman et al, 2018;Shahraki et al, 2019), since LIW often assumes finite and rather static set of locations, typically associated to small world regions. Instead, we use tweet nouns, which can be dynamically updated and that can refer to geographic words and also other terms with a location context (e.g., events, people or organizations).…”
Section: Most Research Work That Focus On Geographic Coordinates (Gcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The location mostly referred to in users' profiles is assigned as the event location. The implementation of this method is inspired to the work of Giridhar et al [35] and it is already used as baseline in [36]; • Maximum Location Frequency (LocFreq): this approach consists of finding the frequencies of locations specified by the users when they posted a tweet about an event, namely the frequencies of the values of the attribute place.name. The location value mostly specified is assigned as the event location.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These platforms, also called as online social networks (OSNs), have become part of the daily life of millions of people around the world who constantly maintain and create new social relationships [2,3]. OSNs providing location-based services for users to check-in in a physical place are called location-based social networks (LBSNs) [4,5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%