2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11576-010-0223-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidenzbasierte Strukturierung und Bewertung empirischer Forschung im Requirements Engineering

Abstract: Evidenzbasierte Strukturierung und Bewertung empirischer Forschung im Requirements Engineering Grundlagen, Ordnungsrahmen, ForschungslandkarteEmpirische Erkenntnisse über die Angemessenheit und Vorteilhaftigkeit von konkurrierenden Methoden und Techniken des Requirements Engineering sind rar. Gleichzeitig sind vorhandene Erkenntnisse mit unterschiedlichen Forschungsmethoden erarbeitet und bisher nicht konsolidiert worden. Der Beitrag strukturiert empirische Erkenntnisse, bewertet sie und stellt sie in einer Fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All stakeholders have to develop 'intersubjectively held mental models' (Gasson, 1999: 89) or 'shared technological frames' (Orlikowski and Gash, 1994) to reach consensus and build a shared understanding of requirements. However, not much research on ISD and requirements development goes beyond the impact of methods and principles (Kautz et al, 2007;Goeken and Patas, 2010;Siau et al, 2010). Few studies have actually investigated knowledge transfer, communication, and building of shared understanding (for example.…”
Section: Related Work and Theoreticai Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All stakeholders have to develop 'intersubjectively held mental models' (Gasson, 1999: 89) or 'shared technological frames' (Orlikowski and Gash, 1994) to reach consensus and build a shared understanding of requirements. However, not much research on ISD and requirements development goes beyond the impact of methods and principles (Kautz et al, 2007;Goeken and Patas, 2010;Siau et al, 2010). Few studies have actually investigated knowledge transfer, communication, and building of shared understanding (for example.…”
Section: Related Work and Theoreticai Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%