1998
DOI: 10.1093/bja/81.5.771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evoked responses in anaesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
1
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
69
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for why we did not find a significant effect for the LDAEP of the P2 component in our experiments is that the mean amplitude of the P2 component is lower in rats than in humans (Sambeth et al, 2003). Furthermore, anesthesia reduces the AEP amplitudes, probably through a concomitant inhibition of the excitatory postsynaptic potentials of cortical pyramidal cells (Maclver et al, 1996;Schwender et al, 1997;Thornton and Sharpe, 1998;Antunes et al, 2003). As the animals in our study were anesthetized, the amplitude of the P2 component might have been decreased to a level at which differences were not significantly measurable whereas the naturally higher N1 component still showed a pronounced LDAEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A possible explanation for why we did not find a significant effect for the LDAEP of the P2 component in our experiments is that the mean amplitude of the P2 component is lower in rats than in humans (Sambeth et al, 2003). Furthermore, anesthesia reduces the AEP amplitudes, probably through a concomitant inhibition of the excitatory postsynaptic potentials of cortical pyramidal cells (Maclver et al, 1996;Schwender et al, 1997;Thornton and Sharpe, 1998;Antunes et al, 2003). As the animals in our study were anesthetized, the amplitude of the P2 component might have been decreased to a level at which differences were not significantly measurable whereas the naturally higher N1 component still showed a pronounced LDAEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…12 Alterations of sensory evoked potentials by general anesthetics 13 likely reflect changes in the strength and temporal pattern of dipole activation because general anesthetics impair synaptic transmission. 14 Localization of the generators of the human 40-Hz ASSR with BESA has proposed that the response mainly arises from six concurrently active dipoles: D1, a cortical, tangentially oriented dipole in the contralateral supratemporal plane; D2, a cortical, radially oriented dipole in the contralateral supratemporal plane; D3 and D4, duplicating D1 and D2 in the ipsilateral supratemporal plane; D5, a vertically oriented dipole in the midline brainstem; and D6, a laterally oriented dipole in the midline brainstem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AEP Monitor uses active acoustic stimulation, delivered through headphones, to generate middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) (Kurita et al 2001). Anaesthetics or sedation alters EEG latency and amplitude (Drummond 2000;Thornton and Sharpe 1998) and these changes are used to generate the A-line ARX Index TM (AAI) (Mantzaridis and Kenny 1997). BIS and AAI have a range from zero, where patient's EEG is isoelectric, to 100, when patients are awake (Nishiyama and Hanaoka 2004;Rampil 1998).…”
Section: Norwood Usa) and Alaris Auditory Evoked Potentials (Aep) Momentioning
confidence: 99%