2014
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and origin of sympatric shallow-water morphotypes of Lake Trout, Salvelinus namaycush, in Canada’s Great Bear Lake

Abstract: Range expansion in north-temperate fishes subsequent to the retreat of the Wisconsinan glaciers has resulted in the rapid colonization of previously unexploited, heterogeneous habitats and, in many situations, secondary contact among conspecific lineages that were once previously isolated. Such ecological opportunity coupled with reduced competition likely promoted morphological and genetic differentiation within and among post-glacial fish populations. Discrete morphological forms existing in sympatry, for ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduced somatic growth and higher reproductive investment were found in the generalist morph (Morph 1), high growth rates throughout life characterized the piscivorous morph (Morph 2), and intermediate life histories defined the more benthic‐ and pelagic‐oriented morphs (Morph 3 and Morph 4) (Chavarie, Howland, Venturelli et al., ). Finally, the four morphotypes showed some genetic differentiation from one another, especially Morph 2 when compared to the three other morphs (Harris et al., ). However, morphotypes were genetically more similar to one another when compared with populations from outside Great Bear Lake, supporting an intralake model of divergence (Harris et al., ) (Table ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reduced somatic growth and higher reproductive investment were found in the generalist morph (Morph 1), high growth rates throughout life characterized the piscivorous morph (Morph 2), and intermediate life histories defined the more benthic‐ and pelagic‐oriented morphs (Morph 3 and Morph 4) (Chavarie, Howland, Venturelli et al., ). Finally, the four morphotypes showed some genetic differentiation from one another, especially Morph 2 when compared to the three other morphs (Harris et al., ). However, morphotypes were genetically more similar to one another when compared with populations from outside Great Bear Lake, supporting an intralake model of divergence (Harris et al., ) (Table ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the four morphotypes showed some genetic differentiation from one another, especially Morph 2 when compared to the three other morphs (Harris et al., ). However, morphotypes were genetically more similar to one another when compared with populations from outside Great Bear Lake, supporting an intralake model of divergence (Harris et al., ) (Table ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wilson et al, 2004;Adams et al, 2007a;Gomez-Uchida et al, 2008;Corrigan et al, 2011;Kapralova et al, 2011;Garduño-Paz et al, 2012;May-McNally et al, 2014;Gordeeva et al, 2015) and in lake charr (e.g. Guinand et al, 2012;Harris et al, 2015). Morphs of Arctic charr also differ significantly in functional loci such as immunological genes (Kapralova et al, 2013;Conejeros et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation at 23 microsatellite loci was assessed as previously described by Harris et al (2015). Variation at 23 microsatellite loci was assessed as previously described by Harris et al (2015).…”
Section: Genetic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%