Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundAn adequate amount of prepaid resources for health is important to ensure access to health services and for the pursuit of universal health coverage. Previous studies on global health financing have described the relationship between economic development and health financing. In this study, we further explore global health financing trends and examine how the sources of funds used, types of services purchased, and development assistance for health disbursed change with economic development. We also identify countries that deviate from the trends.MethodsWe estimated national health spending by type of care and by source, including development assistance for health, based on a diverse set of data including programme reports, budget data, national estimates, and 964 National Health Accounts. These data represent health spending for 184 countries from 1995 through 2014. We converted these data into a common inflation-adjusted and purchasing power-adjusted currency, and used non-linear regression methods to model the relationship between health financing, time, and economic development.FindingsBetween 1995 and 2014, economic development was positively associated with total health spending and a shift away from a reliance on development assistance and out-of-pocket (OOP) towards government spending. The largest absolute increase in spending was in high-income countries, which increased to purchasing power-adjusted $5221 per capita based on an annual growth rate of 3·0%. The largest health spending growth rates were in upper-middle-income (5·9) and lower-middle-income groups (5·0), which both increased spending at more than 5% per year, and spent $914 and $267 per capita in 2014, respectively. Spending in low-income countries grew nearly as fast, at 4·6%, and health spending increased from $51 to $120 per capita. In 2014, 59·2% of all health spending was financed by the government, although in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 29·1% and 58·0% of spending was OOP spending and 35·7% and 3·0% of spending was development assistance. Recent growth in development assistance for health has been tepid; between 2010 and 2016, it grew annually at 1·8%, and reached US$37·6 billion in 2016. Nonetheless, there is a great deal of variation revolving around these averages. 29 countries spend at least 50% more than expected per capita, based on their level of economic development alone, whereas 11 countries spend less than 50% their expected amount.InterpretationHealth spending remains disparate, with low-income and lower-middle-income countries increasing spending in absolute terms the least, and relying heavily on OOP spending and development assistance. Moreover, tremendous variation shows that neither time nor economic development guarantee adequate prepaid health resources, which are vital for the pursuit of universal health coverage.FundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Future and potential spending on health 2015–40: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries

“…Furthermore, our mean development assistance for health estimates suggest that development assistance for health will only marginally increase by 2040. The weak growth of health spending in the future in some countries is a result of the expected tepid growth in development assistance for health, and underlines the important part that development assistance for health continues to play in supporting health and health systems in low-income and middle-income countries 14 . An important factor related to this difference is how health spending is distributed within each country.…”

“…We extracted health spending data for 184 countries spanning 1995 to 2014 from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's Financing Global Health 2016 database 14, 29. These data track government health spending from domestic sources, including general budget support and social health insurance; prepaid private health spending, which includes private insurance and non-governmental organisation spending; out-of-pocket health spending, which includes all spending at point-of-service and copayments; and developmental assistance for health.…”

Americans’ Health Mindsets: Content, Cultural Patterning, and Associations With Physical and Mental Health

“…The USA ranks #1 in the world in per capita health care spending [71], but in the bottom half of wealthy nations in life expectancy, infant mortality, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes [72]. Low-income and ethnic minority Americans, who are rapidly becoming the nation's majority populations [19], bear a disproportionate amount of this disease burden [18,73,74].…”

California Universal Health Care Bill: an economic stimulus and life-saving proposal

“…For example, the US ranks 59th for amenable mortality from heart disease, 44th for amenable mortality from cancer, 8 and 41st for infant mortality, 10 despite the highest per-capita healthcare expenditures in the world. 19 Over the past 15 years, healthcare premiums have soared by more than 150% and healthcare expenditures by 130%, compared to only a 35% rise in median household income. 20–22 Meanwhile, the trend of increasing life expectancy in the US has been slight—even reversing since 2014.…”

“…The US has the greatest per-capita healthcare spending in the world, but 34 countries - each of which provides healthcare for all its citizens - score more highly than the US on the HAQ Index. 8,9,19 …”