2014
DOI: 10.7150/thno.7473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution- and Structure-Based Computational Strategy Reveals the Impact of Deleterious Missense Mutations on MODY 2 (Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young, Type 2)

Abstract: Heterozygous mutations in the central glycolytic enzyme glucokinase (GCK) can result in an autosomal dominant inherited disease, namely maturity-onset diabetes of the young, type 2 (MODY 2). MODY 2 is characterised by early onset: it usually appears before 25 years of age and presents as a mild form of hyperglycaemia. In recent years, the number of known GCK mutations has markedly increased. As a result, interpreting which mutations cause a disease or confer susceptibility to a disease and characterising these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP), and False Negative (FN) were calculated for each mutation by comparing the tool results and the prevalence, which was also used to calculate the above mentioned parameters for the 5 in silico tools. The reliability of the prediction can be determined by Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), where a score of 1 indicates the best reliability, −1 indicates the worst reliability and a score near to 0 indicates that the prediction is a result of chance42. Based on the results obtained from the in silico tools, the mutations that could have an effect on the protein were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP), and False Negative (FN) were calculated for each mutation by comparing the tool results and the prevalence, which was also used to calculate the above mentioned parameters for the 5 in silico tools. The reliability of the prediction can be determined by Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), where a score of 1 indicates the best reliability, −1 indicates the worst reliability and a score near to 0 indicates that the prediction is a result of chance42. Based on the results obtained from the in silico tools, the mutations that could have an effect on the protein were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B). The loss of hydrophobic and negatively charged interaction might lead to loss of thermodynamics stability [George et al, ; Doss et al, ]. This supports that the loss of hydrophobic residue (VAL90) and negatively charged residue (ASP91) might serve the reason for destabilization of protein due to G1691S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The distinction between the variants which affect the protein structure and function from those who have little or no effect from larger pool of data obtained through experimental techniques is highly tedious [Doss et al, ]. The prioritization of pathogenic variants and studying their structural influence at molecular level through computational approaches has become the future step for drug therapeutic approach [George et al, ; Doss et al, ; Thirumal et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the SASA analysis of the mutant PTEN protein displayed notable fluctuations from the native PTEN protein structure. The increased solvent‐accessible area in the mutant protein structures indicates that the single nucleotide polymorphism causing residues changes in the protein structures may increase the probability of their interaction with surrounding molecules and vice versa . Thus, the trajectory analysis for the mutant structures G129E, C124R, D252G, H61D, and R130G revealed the extent of deleterious effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms influencing the functional and structural attributes of the protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%