2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and temporal constraints of a multiphase postglacial rock slope failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Iceland, the occurrence of large landslides is attributed to ice retreat following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), either by the effect of glacial debuttressing or glacial rebound (e.g. Ballantyne, 2002;Coquin et al, 2015;Cossart et al, 2014;Fernández-Fernández et al, 2022;Saemundsson et al, 2022;Vick et al, 2021) or by pressurised water derived from glacial melting (Whalley et al, 1983). The ages available for large landslides in Iceland fit the paraglacial exhaustion model.…”
Section: Landslides In Icelandmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In Iceland, the occurrence of large landslides is attributed to ice retreat following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), either by the effect of glacial debuttressing or glacial rebound (e.g. Ballantyne, 2002;Coquin et al, 2015;Cossart et al, 2014;Fernández-Fernández et al, 2022;Saemundsson et al, 2022;Vick et al, 2021) or by pressurised water derived from glacial melting (Whalley et al, 1983). The ages available for large landslides in Iceland fit the paraglacial exhaustion model.…”
Section: Landslides In Icelandmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Catastrophic failure of part or all of the landslide may be possible with or without total retreat of the glacier from the toe of the landslide (e.g., McColl et al., 2010). Alternatively, movement may persist for several hundreds or thousands of years prior to failure (e.g., Vick et al., 2022) or the landslide may be moving toward self‐stabilization (e.g., Goren & Aharonov, 2009). Our observations indicate that the evolution of the kinematic elements will continue with time and continued glacial retreat, and that their boundaries and the resultant implications for hazard assessments (e.g., volume of material entering the water in the event of catastrophic failure) may need to be reassessed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematic elements form and are bound by landslide faults that develop in response to differential patterns and amounts of movement. Much previous work on mapping and discriminating landslide structures and kinematic elements has been performed for slow-moving earthflows (e.g., Fleming et al, 1999;Guerriero et al, 2014) and paraglacial landslides (e.g., Fey et al, 2017;Vick et al, 2020Vick et al, , 2022, and to define landslide dynamics during catastrophic failures (e.g., Coe et al, 2016;Collins & Reid, 2019). Until recently, documentation of landslide structures and kinematic elements and their evolution through time was rare in actively degrading cryospheric terrain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…occurrence of mass-wasting decreases exponentially over time after deglaciation. In Iceland, the occurrence of large landslides is attributed to ice retreat following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), either by the effect of glacial debuttressing or glacial rebound (e.g., Ballantyne, 2002;Coquin et al, 2015;Cossart et al, 2014;Fernández-Fernández et al, 2022;130 Saemundsson et al, 2022;Vick et al, 2021) or by pressurised water derived from glacial melting (Whalley et al, 1983). The ages available for large landslides in Iceland fit the paraglacial exhaustion model.…”
Section: Martian Long Runout Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 96%