2005
DOI: 10.4267/dechets-sciences-techniques.1880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évolution de la qualité physico-chimique et bactériologique d’un effluent laitier sur un cycle annuel

Abstract: Boues d'industries de traitement de surface Bibliographie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the treatment operation is not functional at the studied dairy industry, the proliferation of contaminant bacteria is justified, where the bacteriological analysis results of the raw dairy effluents showed a significant bacterial load. These results are in agreement with a previous study carried out by Benyagoub et al (2018a) on dairy effluents discharged from the same studied dairy industry where a load of thermotolerant coliforms and fecal streptococci were in the range of 2,07 log 10 to 5,2 log 10 CFU/100 mL, and from 1,84 log 10 to 5,9 log 10 CFU/100 mL, respectively, and remains lower than that reported by Hamdani et al (2005) in which the studied dairy effluents during a year have thermotolerant coliforms and fecal streptococci loads ranging from 4,29 to 4,6 log 10 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the treatment operation is not functional at the studied dairy industry, the proliferation of contaminant bacteria is justified, where the bacteriological analysis results of the raw dairy effluents showed a significant bacterial load. These results are in agreement with a previous study carried out by Benyagoub et al (2018a) on dairy effluents discharged from the same studied dairy industry where a load of thermotolerant coliforms and fecal streptococci were in the range of 2,07 log 10 to 5,2 log 10 CFU/100 mL, and from 1,84 log 10 to 5,9 log 10 CFU/100 mL, respectively, and remains lower than that reported by Hamdani et al (2005) in which the studied dairy effluents during a year have thermotolerant coliforms and fecal streptococci loads ranging from 4,29 to 4,6 log 10 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, we must focus on two essential points: First, the regeneration of the saturated adsorbent during the scaling-up by moving from the laboratory stage to the industrial scale, which can be considered as waste and its disposal, cannot be an economical option. This may include chemical, biological, or thermal way as practical methods, and according to El-Naas and Alhaija (2011), the most common methods consist of temperature changes (thermal swing adsorption) and changes in pressure (pressure swing adsorption); Second, the studied dairy industry should establish a program to limit the volume and pollutant load of discharged dairy effluents (Hamdani et al 2005;Benyagoub 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values depend on the use of hot water where the wastewater generated by pre-rinsing operations and detergent cleaning carried out at temperatures up to 55 and 70 °C, respectively, are too hot, and the regenerative heat exchange in dairy processing (Sayad 2015). The values found are close to those cited by Raho ghalem (2017), which were between 19 and 22 °C, and similar to that cited by Sekkoum (2004), which were between 20 and 25 °C for the raw effluent and 29 °C after its biological treatment, but they are higher than those cited by Mahrouche and Saaoui (2017), which were between 11.8 and 25.1 °C, and lower than that cited by Hamdani et al (2005), working on the dairy effluents from Djedida dairy unit (Morocco), which were between 23 and 43 °C with an average temperature value of 33 °C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As a result, the analyzed dairy effluents were milky (i.e., mainly diluted milk or milk products) and characterized by a hydrogen potential (pH) ranging from 5.09 to 8.27, slightly alkaline, and located in the range recommended by the Algerian standard. These variations in pH depend on the use of chemicals such as nitric acid and NaOH (caustic soda) in the cleaning and disinfecting operation for equipment, and piping circuit of dairy industry (Hamdani et al 2005), which can influence the pH of the receptor medium (Rodier et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some groundwater can also be contaminated with nitrates due to the leaching of natural vegetation [6]. The nitrate content ranged from 4.96 to 21327.44 mg L-1; this is probably due to the use of nitric acid as a chemical disinfectant for closed pipeline circuits [20], by the nitri cation reaction of the organic nitrogen present in industrial e uents at the basin level . In fact, nitri cation is a two-step process in which ammoniacal nitrogen is oxidized to nitrites (NO2-) then to nitrates (NO3-) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%