Évolution du don de rein : quelles causes de non-prélèvement rénal et quelles solutions ?

Dahri, S.; Doukkali, B.; Kabbali, N.; Arrayhani, M.; Sqalli, T.

doi:10.1016/j.nephro.2015.07.442

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We think that the first step should be an accurate analysis of the causes for donor's exclusion. In the present study, 43 of potential living kidney donors were excluded at various stages of preoperative, this percentage was consistent with reports from other groups, which is in agreement with what was reported by Boulahya et al [1], who reported a 42.3% acceptance rate, and is little bit lower than what was reported by Dahri 36% [2], and a higher rate observed to the New York team at 56.9% by Romagnoli et al [3], These discrepancies in reports may be explained by the different exclusion criteria and protocols used per each transplantation center.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exclusion Reasons of Living Kidney Donor Candidates

Ezzaki¹,

Failal²,

Mtioui³

et al. 2019

J Nephrol Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Kidney transplantation from living donors is increasing, and living donor selection criteria must be strict to ensure the safety of donors. Materials and methods: It is a single center retrospective study over a period of 7 years. Results: There are 43 challenged donors. The average age is 43.9, of whom 58.3% are women, the applicants for the donation were essentially from 44.4% ascendants, and the causes of donor exclusion were: the presence of donorspecific anti-HLA antibodies, positive cross-match, age limit, diabetes, arterial hypertension, obesity, disturbed renal morphological abnormalities and vascular abnormalities Conclusions: The selection criteria for living relatives have been expanded to increase the chances of receiving a kidney; however, some contraindications remain incontestable.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…The predominant relationship between donors and recipients were from the ascendant in 44.4, especially mother donating to her son/ daughter, our results joined those of Algeria [4], while the collaterals represent the most frequent potential donors in the series of studies of Mauritania [5] and Tunisia [2].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%