2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2208886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution, Fertility and the Ageing Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the first question, the fertility rebound (despite being more moderate in magnitude) has already exceeded the baby boom, in terms of its length, in many countries. Furthermore, for several demographic researchers, it is projected as a persistent characteristic in the demographic trends of many developed countries for the foreseeable future (e.g., Alkema et al ., 2011; Collins and Richards, 2013; Schmertmann et al ., 2014). These are the reasons why, rather than being a temporary (cyclical) change, the fertility rebound reflects a more persistent change in trend, whereas the consensus of the literature on the theory of fertility is that the baby boom was a temporary interruption to the secular decline in fertility rates that began during the late 1800s (e.g., Van Bavel and Reher 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the first question, the fertility rebound (despite being more moderate in magnitude) has already exceeded the baby boom, in terms of its length, in many countries. Furthermore, for several demographic researchers, it is projected as a persistent characteristic in the demographic trends of many developed countries for the foreseeable future (e.g., Alkema et al ., 2011; Collins and Richards, 2013; Schmertmann et al ., 2014). These are the reasons why, rather than being a temporary (cyclical) change, the fertility rebound reflects a more persistent change in trend, whereas the consensus of the literature on the theory of fertility is that the baby boom was a temporary interruption to the secular decline in fertility rates that began during the late 1800s (e.g., Van Bavel and Reher 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis of the dynamics of an economically relevant preference is by Collins and Richards (), who considered the evolution of fertility preferences after a fertility shock. They proposed that the genes associated with higher fertility will spread through the population after a negative fertility shock because individuals with high fertility have a fitness advantage.…”
Section: The Interaction Of Economic and Evolutionary Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trade may make an unproductive (LL) person better off in the short term, but over the long term their unproductive alleles will be eliminatedtotally in the case of no trade and from at least one locus in the case of trade. 13 A recent analysis of the dynamics of an economically relevant preference is by Collins and Richards (2013), who considered the evolution of fertility preferences after a fertility shock. They proposed that the genes associated with higher fertility will spread through the population after a negative fertility shock because individuals with high fertility have a fitness advantage.…”
Section: (Ii) Evolution Of Economic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trade may make an unproductive (LL) person better off in the short-term, but over the long-term, their unproductive alleles will be eliminated -totally in the case of no trade and from at least one locus in the case of trade. 13 A recent analysis of the dynamics of an economically relevant preference is by Collins and Richards (2013), who considered the evolution of fertility preferences after a fertility shock. They proposed that the genes associated with higher fertility will spread through the population after a negative fertility shock because individuals with high fertility have a fitness advantage.…”
Section: Evolution Of Economic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%