1977
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(77)90164-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution from deep inelastic transfer to quasi-fission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that sense, they are different from the reactions usually studied, and it was interesting to investigate their characteristics. Part of these results have already been published [18][19][20]. They concern the Ar induced reactions, and the 4-charge transfer reactions induced by Cu and Fe ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In that sense, they are different from the reactions usually studied, and it was interesting to investigate their characteristics. Part of these results have already been published [18][19][20]. They concern the Ar induced reactions, and the 4-charge transfer reactions induced by Cu and Fe ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This may explain a difference of about 1 fm in favour of the present value. Secondly, as was outlined in [10,14] Finally, one should remark that the hypothesis of rolling is difficult to reconcile with a strong deformation of the composite system at scission. For the angular momentum calculations, it has been associated with the hypothesis of two tangent spheres.…”
Section: Iv22 System 4~ + 144smmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If one neglects the deformation effects, the deexcitation of an excited Dy or Tb fragment, after separation from the light one, can be treated in the same way as that of an identical nucleus produced through a fusion reaction, the only possible difference being the initial population of excitation energy E* and angular momentum J. The excitation energies of the Tb fragments produced in the present experiment can be calculated from the kinetic energy measured for the Tb residues, assuming a two-body process and a sharing of the excitation energies between the fragments proportionally to their masses [8][9][10]. Such calculations lead to E* values lying in the range 30-60MeV according to the incident energy for the projectiles 4~ and 63Cu.…”
Section: Interpretation In Terms Of Tb Fragment Angular Momentamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations