2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2022.101129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of a GDE setup: Beyond ambient conditions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the hot pressing of the GDE was an important element in extending the kinetic-dominated potential region, mass transport limitations were still present at current densities greater than 100 mA cm geo −2 . 28 There were further limitations due to the setup configuration, as it was previously reported by Wiberg et al 29 that the position of the reference electrode and the counter electrode in the single chamber design could vary during the measurements, therefore leading to substantial differences in the iR correction especially at high current densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the hot pressing of the GDE was an important element in extending the kinetic-dominated potential region, mass transport limitations were still present at current densities greater than 100 mA cm geo −2 . 28 There were further limitations due to the setup configuration, as it was previously reported by Wiberg et al 29 that the position of the reference electrode and the counter electrode in the single chamber design could vary during the measurements, therefore leading to substantial differences in the iR correction especially at high current densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. 28 There were further limitations due to the setup conguration, as it was previously reported by Wiberg et al 29 that the position of the reference electrode and the counter electrode in the single chamber design could vary during the measurements, therefore leading to substantial differences in the iR correction especially at high current densities. At the same time, given the small area of the working electrode (WE), the edge imperfections and inhomogeneities led to a larger spread in the obtained results.…”
Section: Setup Development: From Gde To Ptementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 While these GDE setups were so far mostly utilized at room temperature and limited to ambient pressure, a setup was recently presented, which allows measurements at temperatures up to 120 1C and pressures of up to 4 bar. 23 What is still under debate, is how GDE measurements differ in detail from MEA measurements and what possible limitations the technique has. Despite the temperature difference (mostly room temperature in GDE testing, 80 1C in MEA testing), one important issue is whether GDE half-cell characterization is carried out with or without an ionomer membrane between the catalyst surface and the liquid electrolyte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 While these GDE setups were so far mostly utilized at room temperature and limited to ambient pressure, a setup was recently presented, which allows measurements at temperatures up to 120 °C and pressures of up to 4 bar. 23…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%