2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of a helper virus-derived, ribosome binding translational enhancer in an untranslated satellite RNA of Turnip crinkle virus

Abstract: SatC is a noncoding subviral RNA associated with Turnip crinkle virus (TCV). A 100-nt stretch in the 3’UTR of TCV contains three hairpins and two pseudoknots that fold into a tRNA-shaped structure (TSS) that binds 80S ribosomes. The 3'half of satC is derived from TCV and contains 6-nt differences in the TSS-analogous region. SatC binds poorly to 80S ribosomes, and molecular modeling that predicted the 3D structure of the TSS did not predict a similar structure for satC. When the satC TSS region was step-wise c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In TCV but not satC, H5 along with H4a, H4b, Ψ 2 (a pseudoknot formed from sequences immediately 3′ of H5 and in the loop of H4b) and Ψ 3 (a pseudoknot between the loop of H4a and upstream adjacent sequence) fold into a T-shaped structure (TSS; McCormack et al ., 2008) that binds to ribosomes and serves as a cap-independent translation enhancer (Stupina et al ., 2008). This region in satC is not predicted to form a TSS and no longer binds efficiently to ribosomes due to six positional differences with the TCV parental sequence (Guo et al ., 2011). However, hairpins H5, H4a, H4b and pseudoknot Ψ 2 are important for satC accumulation (Zhang et al ., 2006c), and Ψ 3 appears to be important for satC fitness (Guo et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In TCV but not satC, H5 along with H4a, H4b, Ψ 2 (a pseudoknot formed from sequences immediately 3′ of H5 and in the loop of H4b) and Ψ 3 (a pseudoknot between the loop of H4a and upstream adjacent sequence) fold into a T-shaped structure (TSS; McCormack et al ., 2008) that binds to ribosomes and serves as a cap-independent translation enhancer (Stupina et al ., 2008). This region in satC is not predicted to form a TSS and no longer binds efficiently to ribosomes due to six positional differences with the TCV parental sequence (Guo et al ., 2011). However, hairpins H5, H4a, H4b and pseudoknot Ψ 2 are important for satC accumulation (Zhang et al ., 2006c), and Ψ 3 appears to be important for satC fitness (Guo et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This region in satC is not predicted to form a TSS and no longer binds efficiently to ribosomes due to six positional differences with the TCV parental sequence (Guo et al ., 2011). However, hairpins H5, H4a, H4b and pseudoknot Ψ 2 are important for satC accumulation (Zhang et al ., 2006c), and Ψ 3 appears to be important for satC fitness (Guo et al ., 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although satC contains the TCV region that harbors the TSS, six positional differences between satC and TCV in this region disrupt the TSS structure (Stupina et al, 2008), and satC is unable to bind to ribosomes (Guo et al, 2011;Stupina et al, 2008).…”
Section: Higher-order Structures: Carmovirus 3'citesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current model for the gRNA switching from a translated template to a replication template posits that the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) binds to an A-rich region upstream of H4a/Ψ 3 , leading to disruption of H4a/Ψ 3 that disassembles the TSS, resulting in a widespread conformational switch (Yuan et al ., 2009; Yuan et al ., 2012; Le et al ., 2017). SatC, despite having similar versions of all these hairpins and pseudoknots, is not predicted to form a TSS and does not bind ribosomes due to 6 single-nt differences with the TSS of TCV (Guo et al ., 2011). However, initiation of minus-strand synthesis by the RdRp requires that the 3’ end of satC toggles between pre-active and active structures (Zhang et al ., 2006a; Zhang et al ., 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%