Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Barite settling in the annulus behind the casing is an undesired yet common occurrence during the life of a well. Over time, the drilling fluid left in the annulus settles, leaving behind solidified barite that can hinder slot recovery and Plug & Abandonment (P&A) operations by impeding the cut and pull process. During a P&A operation, Equinor acquired settled barite samples from a North Sea well where the casing was held back by these weighting agents, introducing overpull and prolonging the cut and pull operation. A laboratory analysis program that included determination of the particle size distribution, electrokinetic potential of particles (zeta potential), crystallography (XRD), chemical composition (XRF), thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), and microstructure (QEMSCAN) was carried out on these settled barite samples to understand their properties. The results of this study provided valuable insights into the composition and characteristics of the settled material in the annulus. The solidified barite within the annular space exhibited no signs of chemical reactions. XRD analysis confirmed the barite to be the sole predominant solid in the solidified material, aligning with expectations. However, additional analytical techniques, including XRF, QEMSCAN, and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) detected interconnections between barite particles, primarily facilitated by iron or quartz particles. Additionally, trace amounts of calcite, iron-oxide, SiO2, and mixed compositions involving Si, S, Fe, Ba, O, and Cl were identified within the solidified material. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) results indicated that the particles exhibit strong compaction characteristics but lacked cementation, retaining some porosity. Notably, the absence of bentonite or other clays was consistently observed in all analyses. Furthermore, the zeta potential measurements of the samples showed a more stable response than the API barite. This study highlights the process of solidification observed in settled barite, suggesting that factors other than chemical reactions may be responsible for this phenomenon. The potential mechanisms contributing to solidification include physical aggregation, compaction, and alterations in surface charge under downhole conditions. This enhanced understanding of the solidification process will contribute to the development of solutions for efficient casing removal and even the utilization of settled barite as a barrier material.
Barite settling in the annulus behind the casing is an undesired yet common occurrence during the life of a well. Over time, the drilling fluid left in the annulus settles, leaving behind solidified barite that can hinder slot recovery and Plug & Abandonment (P&A) operations by impeding the cut and pull process. During a P&A operation, Equinor acquired settled barite samples from a North Sea well where the casing was held back by these weighting agents, introducing overpull and prolonging the cut and pull operation. A laboratory analysis program that included determination of the particle size distribution, electrokinetic potential of particles (zeta potential), crystallography (XRD), chemical composition (XRF), thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), and microstructure (QEMSCAN) was carried out on these settled barite samples to understand their properties. The results of this study provided valuable insights into the composition and characteristics of the settled material in the annulus. The solidified barite within the annular space exhibited no signs of chemical reactions. XRD analysis confirmed the barite to be the sole predominant solid in the solidified material, aligning with expectations. However, additional analytical techniques, including XRF, QEMSCAN, and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) detected interconnections between barite particles, primarily facilitated by iron or quartz particles. Additionally, trace amounts of calcite, iron-oxide, SiO2, and mixed compositions involving Si, S, Fe, Ba, O, and Cl were identified within the solidified material. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) results indicated that the particles exhibit strong compaction characteristics but lacked cementation, retaining some porosity. Notably, the absence of bentonite or other clays was consistently observed in all analyses. Furthermore, the zeta potential measurements of the samples showed a more stable response than the API barite. This study highlights the process of solidification observed in settled barite, suggesting that factors other than chemical reactions may be responsible for this phenomenon. The potential mechanisms contributing to solidification include physical aggregation, compaction, and alterations in surface charge under downhole conditions. This enhanced understanding of the solidification process will contribute to the development of solutions for efficient casing removal and even the utilization of settled barite as a barrier material.
Summary Barite settling in the annulus behind the casing is an undesired yet common occurrence during the life of a well. Over time, the drilling fluid left in the annulus settles, leaving behind solidified barite that can hinder slot recovery and plug and abandonment (P&A) operations by impeding the cut and pull process. During a P&A operation, Equinor acquired settled barite samples from a North Sea well where the casing was held back by these weighting agents, introducing overpull and prolonging the cut and pull operation. A laboratory analysis program that included determination of the particle-size distribution (PSD), electrokinetic potential of particles (zeta potential), crystallography [X-ray diffraction (XRD)], chemical composition [X-ray fluorescence (XRF)], thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and microstructure [scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and quantitative evaluation of materials by scanning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN)] was carried out on these settled barite samples to understand their properties. The results of this study provided valuable insights into the composition and characteristics of the settled material in the annulus. The solidified barite within the annular space exhibited no signs of chemical reactions. XRD analysis confirmed the barite to be the sole predominant solid in the solidified material, aligning with expectations. However, additional analytical techniques, including XRF, QEMSCAN, and EDS, detected interconnections between barite particles, primarily facilitated by iron or quartz particles. Additionally, trace amounts of calcite, iron oxide, and mixed compositions involving Si, S, Fe, Ba, O, and Cl were identified within the solidified material. SEM results indicated that the particles exhibited strong compaction characteristics but lacked cementation, retaining some porosity. Notably, the absence of bentonite or other clays was consistently observed in all analyses. This study highlights the process of solidification observed in settled barite, suggesting that factors other than chemical reactions may be responsible for this phenomenon. The potential mechanisms contributing to solidification include physical aggregation, compaction, and alterations in surface charge under downhole conditions. This enhanced understanding of the solidification process will contribute to the development of solutions for efficient casing removal and even the usage of settled barite as a barrier material.
The drilling industry has always relied on cement as a primary barrier. Although the cement represents about 5% of the well cost, when squeezes are required, cementing averages 17% of the well cost. Only 50% of the squeezes achieve the objective of establishing a barrier for well integrity. A little bit more than half of the failures can be attributed to operational challenges (pump failure, cement contamination), or design oversights (cement recipe, centralizers). However there are still cement failures with perfect design and field execution. These failures typically exhibit some of the following characteristics: high deviation, high pressure, washouts, natural fractures, long casing section, heterogeneous sands. For these specific conditions, it is beneficial to add an assurance that would maintain the integrity of the well even in case of bad cement. Some of the assurances used include port collars, external casing packers (ECP) and swell packers. Port collars allow a squeeze above the first stage cement, while ECP serves as a base for a second stage cement, and swell packers provides a baffle for sustained casing pressure. A more recent technology is the well annular barrier that can form a combined barrier with cement, and can also be used as a stand-alone primary barrier. The well annular barrier is a metal-expandable barrier that is expanded with hydraulic pressure. It is full bore, highly customizable, and qualified to ISO 14310. The metallurgy allows the packer to shape fit into either an open hole with irregular geometry or inside a casing to preclude annular pressure build up by giving a life-of-well reliable seal. The well annular barrier has been deployed in a variety of wells to achieve well integrity with and without cement, protect the B-annulus from sustained casing pressure, or serve as a barrier between reservoirs that cannot be commingled. This paper performs a review of the technologies used for cement assurance, their advantages and disadvantages. Case histories of well annular barrier deployments are presented, including a case where the well annular barrier was used as a stand-alone well barrier element without the need for dispensation. This paper also discusses how the well annular barrier fits into the regulatory requirements for well construction providing to the drilling industry an alternative to cement for the purpose of well integrity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.