2015
DOI: 10.1007/lrsp-2015-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Active Regions

Abstract: The evolution of active regions (AR) from their emergence through their long decay process is of fundamental importance in solar physics. Since large-scale flux is generated by the deepseated dynamo, the observed characteristics of flux emergence and that of the subsequent decay provide vital clues as well as boundary conditions for dynamo models. Throughout their evolution, ARs are centres of magnetic activity, with the level and type of activity phenomena being dependent on the evolutionary stage of the AR. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
(359 reference statements)
3
137
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring the magnetic flux and thus the growth and decay rates is hampered by the low cadence (96 min), the varying noise level as a function of the heliocentric angle, the geometric foreshortening of the pixel area, the angle of the magnetic field lines (assumed to be perpendicular to the surface) with the line-of-sight (LOS), and the small number of pixels having a flux density of more than 20 G. Therefore, we conservatively report only the total unsigned magnetic flux of 2.2 × 10 20 Mx (the negative magnetic flux is 1.2 × 10 20 Mx) at 08:00 UT on 2008 August 7, which attains a maximum right at the time of the high-resolution GFPI observations. The flux contained in the EFR is slightly larger than the upper limit for ephemeral regions (see van Driel-Gesztelyi & Green 2015), that is, much too small to form larger pores or even sunspots. Even though the time resolution is too coarse to provide a growth rate for the magnetic field, our measurements agree with a rapid rise time (already significant changes between the first two magnetograms) and a much slower decay rate (total unsigned flux of 1.3 × 10 20 Mx at 22:24 UT on 2008 August 7).…”
Section: Temporal Evolution Of Micro-poresmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Measuring the magnetic flux and thus the growth and decay rates is hampered by the low cadence (96 min), the varying noise level as a function of the heliocentric angle, the geometric foreshortening of the pixel area, the angle of the magnetic field lines (assumed to be perpendicular to the surface) with the line-of-sight (LOS), and the small number of pixels having a flux density of more than 20 G. Therefore, we conservatively report only the total unsigned magnetic flux of 2.2 × 10 20 Mx (the negative magnetic flux is 1.2 × 10 20 Mx) at 08:00 UT on 2008 August 7, which attains a maximum right at the time of the high-resolution GFPI observations. The flux contained in the EFR is slightly larger than the upper limit for ephemeral regions (see van Driel-Gesztelyi & Green 2015), that is, much too small to form larger pores or even sunspots. Even though the time resolution is too coarse to provide a growth rate for the magnetic field, our measurements agree with a rapid rise time (already significant changes between the first two magnetograms) and a much slower decay rate (total unsigned flux of 1.3 × 10 20 Mx at 22:24 UT on 2008 August 7).…”
Section: Temporal Evolution Of Micro-poresmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…above the C-class) are produced as long as high magnetic flux density/strong magnetic field concentrations are present, and the overall flare production rate decreases sharply with decreasing flux density, while the rate of CME pro-duction shows a much slower decrease with time, ı.e. CMEs keep erupting from active regions well into their decay phase (van Driel-Gesztelyi & Green 2015). This is not surprising, as during the decay phase persistent flux cancellations along inversion lines occur (Green et al 2011).…”
Section: Emergence and Active Life Of Ar Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By all available observational accounts, sunspots form as large-scale flux bundles emerge from the solar interior onto the surface (see reviews by Zwaan 1978Zwaan , 1985Fan 2004Fan , 2009Lites 2009;Cheung & Isobe 2014;van Driel-Gesztelyi & Green 2015). At the scale of photospheric granulation (L ⇠ 1 Mm), the emerging flux reaches the surface as predominantly horizontal fields within the centers of granules (e.g.…”
Section: The Subsurface Origin Of Active Region Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations