In 1977, noble laureate Francois Jacob wrote his famous article 'Evolution and Tinkering'.(1) In this very influential Science paper, Jacob argues that, in contrast to engineering, which works on first principle and aims for optimal solutions, evolution acts by tinkering with what is already available. He suggests that the co-option and the redeployment of existing biological modules are important general principles in the evolution of novel structures. Genes, regulatory pathways and cells are reused in different contexts thereby broadening their original functionality. With the proposal of bricolage, the French term for tinkering, Jacob was clearly ahead of his time and the general importance of his argument only has become clear in the last 10-15 years when evolutionary developmental biology (EDB) found that co-option and redeployment are indeed of fundamental importance in morphological evolution. Multicellular organisms throughout the animal kingdom were shown to share many of the same molecular building blocks and regulatory pathways and researchers now actively focus on identifying how developmental mechanisms are modified to create novelty.Many of the empirical research programs in EDB concentrate on what one would call macroevolutionary studies, the comparison of distantly related species that are often even members of different phyla. It is all too obvious however, that the level at which variation is created is microevolution. And exactly this is EDB's current weakness. While comparisons of distantly related organisms reveal how genes and pathways have been redeployed during development, the origin of the molecular variations that gave rise to these differences mostly remains elusive. Therefore, the Novartis Foundation was well advised to follow the suggestion of Brian Hall to hold a conference on ''Tinkering: the Microevolution of Development''.In the recently published book of the same title, Daniel Lieberman (Harvard University) and Brian Hall (Dalhousie University) introduce the challenge and discuss the different levels that an analysis of tinkering and microevolution should incorporate. Manfred Laubichler (Arizona State University) places the conceptual contribution of Jacob in a philosophical and theoretical context. He also points out that the original reaction to Jacob's paper was mixed. Nearly ten years ago, already in the context of EDB, Denis Duboule (University of Geneva) and Adam Wilkins (BioEssays) used the logic of bricolage to explain how the increased complexity of organisms is brought about.(3) In their contributions, they further elaborate on this question and argue that microevolutionary tinkering involves changes in genetic pathways and networks and that the increase of biological functions per regulatory gene is a crucial principle of metazoan evolution. The young discipline of EDB has many different roots. The wide selection of case studies and concepts discussed at the meeting is stimulating and represents much of the exciting diversity of EDB. Rudi Raff and Elizabeth Raff (Indi...