The neutral theory of molecular evolution asserts that while many mutations are deleterious and rapidly ellminated from populations, those that we observe as polymorphisms within populations are functionally equivalent to each other and thus neutral with respect to fitness. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is widely used as a genetic marker in evolutionary studies and is generally assumed to evolve according to a strictly neutral model of molecular evolution. One prediction of the neutral theory is that the ratio of replacement (nonsynonymous) to silent (synonymous) nucleotide substitutions will be the same within and between species. We To understand the genetic basis of evolutionary change, we must understand the extent to which selection governs the amount and distribution of genetic variation in natural populations. Considerable debate has centered on whether most naturally occurring genetic variants are strictly neutral (1), slightly deleterious (2), or advantageous (3). While these different views imply relatively small differences in selection coefficients, these differences can still have profound consequences for how molecular evolution occurs.The neutral theory, in its strictest form, asserts that while many mutations are strongly deleterious and therefore rapidly eliminated from populations, those that we observe within populations are equivalent with respect to fitness (1). The level of genetic variation within populations is determined by the neutral mutation rate and the effective population size. The amount of divergence between species is determined by the neutral mutation rate and the time since divergence. Under strict neutrality, the amount of variation within species is expected to be correlated with the rate of divergence between species for different genes or gene regions.A modification of the strictly neutral model, known as the nearly neutral or slightly deleterious model (2, 4), proposes that observed variants have a distribution of selective effects focused around neutrality. The extent to which these nearly neutral variants are affected by selection is a function of population size. Variants will behave as neutral if their effect on fitness is less than 1/2N in a diploid population of N individuals. Thus, in a large population, a larger fraction of nearly neutral mutations will be affected by selection. According to this model, the level of polymorphism within species and the rate ofdivergence between species depend on the population size.In addition to these two views, there are a variety ofmodels that describe how balancing selection can maintain variability within populations (e.g., ref. 5) and how directional selection can fix substitutions within populations (e.g., ref. 6).