2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86909-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Automated Deduction and Dynamic Constructions in Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu's (algebraic) method), but there is also the need of readable proof scripts (e.g. Area Method, semi-synthetic) and this two objectives are difficult to attain together [12,13]. There is also the need of an automated deduction method that is adapted to the secondary Listing 1 Rule D1 schools learning, i.e.…”
Section: Rendering Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wu's (algebraic) method), but there is also the need of readable proof scripts (e.g. Area Method, semi-synthetic) and this two objectives are difficult to attain together [12,13]. There is also the need of an automated deduction method that is adapted to the secondary Listing 1 Rule D1 schools learning, i.e.…”
Section: Rendering Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OGPCP, aims to integrate different efforts in the development of GATP, namely: to provide a common open access repository for the development of GATPs; to provide an API to the different GATP in such a way that they can be easily used by users; to develop a portfolio strategies to allow choosing the best GATP for any given geometric conjecture; to interface with repositories of geometric knowledge, e.g. TGTP, 12 TPTP; to develop a GATP System Competition (GASC) to allow rating GATPs [2].…”
Section: Open Source Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated deduction in geometry has been, since 1960s, an important field in the area of automated reasoning. Various methods and techniques have been studied and developed for automatically proving and discovering geometric theorems [22]. Focusing in the DGS/GATP platforms, i.e., platforms that combine the DGS with one (or several) GATP(s) we can highlight (some have been mentioned already): Cinderella, with a randomised prover; GCLC [16], which include several provers (area method, Wu's method and Gröbner basis method) [17]; GeoGebra, which include several algebraic provers [18,19] and JGEx which include several provers (area method, full-angle method, deductive databases method, Wu's method and Gröbner basis method).…”
Section: Geometry Automated Theorem Proversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the early attempts, linked to artificial intelligence, synthetic provers based on inference rules and using forward chaining reasoning has been seen has a more suited approach for education. Using an appropriated set of rules and using forward chaining they can more easily mimic the expected behaviour of a student when developing a proof [2,22].…”
Section: A Rule-based Geometry Automated Theorem Provermentioning
confidence: 99%