2004
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Autosomal Suppression of the Sex-Ratio Trait in Drosophila

Abstract: The sex-ratio trait is the production of female-biased progenies due to X-linked meiotic drive in males of several Drosophila species. The driving X chromosome (called SR) is not fixed due to at least two stabilizing factors: natural selection (favoring ST, the nondriving standard X) and drive suppression by either Y-linked or autosomal genes. The evolution of autosomal suppression is explained by Fisher's principle, a mechanism of natural selection that leads to equal proportion of males and females in a sexu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neutrality of distorter and suppressor alleles resulted in fixation of both, producing even sex ratios, consistent with earlier predictions (Vaz & Carvalho, 2004). High suppressor costs prevented the spread of the suppressor, allowing a sex ratio bias to persist throughout the simulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neutrality of distorter and suppressor alleles resulted in fixation of both, producing even sex ratios, consistent with earlier predictions (Vaz & Carvalho, 2004). High suppressor costs prevented the spread of the suppressor, allowing a sex ratio bias to persist throughout the simulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Fitness reductions associated with suppressors have been documented in both dioecious and gynodioecious systems and occur even in the absence of the associated distorter (Bailey, 2002; Wu et al., 1989). Suppressor costs have been further implicated in MSD species by the observation that frequencies of suppressor alleles are lower than predicted by Fisherian selection alone (Hornett et al., 2014; Vaz & Carvalho, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low frequency, a population is female biased and selection on a suppressor for the maintenance of equal sex ratios is strong; but at high frequency, most copies of the distorter are masked, the population sex ratio is close to 50/50, and selection on a suppressor is much weaker. This result explains why selection for Fisherian sex ratios may be inefficient at removing the last few copies of a nonsuppressor allele, even though under a deterministic model, the suppressor will eventually fix (Vaz and Carvalho 2004). In addition, selection is expected to be even less efficient at purging null suppressors if the functional suppressor is dominant, as vanishingly few individuals will express sex-ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under simple, singlepopulation models of sex-chromosome drive, polymorphism between driving (SR) and standard (ST ) X chromosomes can result from three conditions (Vaz and Carvalho 2004). First, the transmission advantage of an SR chromosome may be balanced by deleterious effects of either the driving locus itself or linked variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation