1992
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions.

Abstract: Learning a bimanual coordination task (synchronization to a visually specified phasing relation) was studied as a dynamical process over 5 days of practicing a required phasing pattern. Systematic probes of the attractor layout of the 5 Ss' coordination dynamics (expressed through a collective variable, relative phase) were conducted before, during, and after practice. Depending on the relationship between the initial coordination dynamics (so-called intrinsic dynamics) and the pattern to be learned (termed be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
405
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 449 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(74 reference statements)
33
405
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Small COM gain was considered improved balance control as participants stabilized their COM in space (Buchanan and Horak, 1999). Relative phase was calculated using the time values of the peaks to compute a point estimate of maximum COM relative to maximum platform position on a cycle-by-cycle basis (Zanone and Kelso, 1992). These values were averaged for each segment within a trial to determine mean relative phase and relative phase variability.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small COM gain was considered improved balance control as participants stabilized their COM in space (Buchanan and Horak, 1999). Relative phase was calculated using the time values of the peaks to compute a point estimate of maximum COM relative to maximum platform position on a cycle-by-cycle basis (Zanone and Kelso, 1992). These values were averaged for each segment within a trial to determine mean relative phase and relative phase variability.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carson, 1993). Key characteristics of such rhythmic coordination stem from the interactions between the moving limbs, due to which only two coordination patterns can be stably performed without training (e.g., Yamanishi, Kawato, & Suzuki, 1979;Zanone & Kelso, 1992): the in-phase pattern (i.e., the limbs oscillate symmetrically; relative phase / = 0°) and the antiphase pattern (i.e., the limbs oscillate in an alternating fashion; / = 180°). The stability properties of these twophase relations have been successfully accounted for by the well-known HKB model (Haken, Kelso, & Bunz, 1985).…”
Section: Asymmetries In Interlimb Coupling Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the resump [1], i widely accepted that motor learning is a discontinuous, non-linear process, marked by deep qualitative behavioural reorganizations [2]- [3]. Moreover, motor learning is characterized by persistent change in behaviour over time [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%