2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-018-9447-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Body Mass in Bats: Insights from a Large Supermatrix Phylogeny

Abstract: Bats are atypical small mammals. Size is crucial for bats because it affects most aerodynamic variables and several key echolocation parameters. In turn, scaling relationships of both flight and echolocation have been suggested to constrain bat body size evolution. Previous studies have found a large phylogenetic effect and the inclusion of early Eocene fossil bats contributed to recover idiosyncratic body size change patterns in bats. Here, we test these previous hypotheses of bat body size evolution using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with our DTA, this could indicate that N. magdalenensis was not a specialised carnivore and could have instead had an insectivorous or omnivorous diet, similar to other omnivorous, large-bodied Miocene noctilionoid species (Hand et al 2015b. Other studies have estimated phyllostomid BM ancestral state range as between 11-12 g, close to the ancestral state for Noctilionoidea (9-12 g) and modern Chiroptera (12-14 g) (Arévalo 2020, Giannini et al 2012, 2020, Moyers Arévalo et al 2018. This suggests relative evolutionary stasis in body size during the early evolution of modern bat families, most of which had evolved and/or had appeared in the fossil record before the early Oligocene (~35 Mya) (Arévalo 2020, Giannini et al 2012, Moyers Arévalo et al 2018.…”
Section: Dietary and Body Mass Reconstruction Of N Magdalenensissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with our DTA, this could indicate that N. magdalenensis was not a specialised carnivore and could have instead had an insectivorous or omnivorous diet, similar to other omnivorous, large-bodied Miocene noctilionoid species (Hand et al 2015b. Other studies have estimated phyllostomid BM ancestral state range as between 11-12 g, close to the ancestral state for Noctilionoidea (9-12 g) and modern Chiroptera (12-14 g) (Arévalo 2020, Giannini et al 2012, 2020, Moyers Arévalo et al 2018. This suggests relative evolutionary stasis in body size during the early evolution of modern bat families, most of which had evolved and/or had appeared in the fossil record before the early Oligocene (~35 Mya) (Arévalo 2020, Giannini et al 2012, Moyers Arévalo et al 2018.…”
Section: Dietary and Body Mass Reconstruction Of N Magdalenensissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other studies have estimated phyllostomid BM ancestral state range as between 11-12 g, close to the ancestral state for Noctilionoidea (9-12 g) and modern Chiroptera (12-14 g) (Arévalo 2020, Giannini et al 2012, 2020, Moyers Arévalo et al 2018. This suggests relative evolutionary stasis in body size during the early evolution of modern bat families, most of which had evolved and/or had appeared in the fossil record before the early Oligocene (~35 Mya) (Arévalo 2020, Giannini et al 2012, Moyers Arévalo et al 2018. Within Phyllostominae, a significant shift to increased size to more than 50 g has been recovered for the clade including C. auritus and V. spectrum (divergence dated at around 16 Mya), highlighting a rapid gain of > 30 g in the first 10 My following the origin of Phyllostomidae (Arévalo 2020).…”
Section: Dietary and Body Mass Reconstruction Of N Magdalenensismentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flying foxes in the genera Pteropus and Acerodon include the world's largest bats (forearm size >89 mm and body mass up to 1600 g) and with 70 species, they constitute over a third of all species in the family Pteropodidae [16,17]. Indonesia is home to about a third of all flying fox species (21 Pteropus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a phylogenetic tree). Although generally assumed to require slow evolutionary rate to report reasonable results (Omland ), recent research shows that very high evolutionary rates of character change is as faithfully captured by parsimony reconstruction as small, even erratic changes (Moyers Arévalo et al ). In addition, parsimony does not require specification of branch length and can successfully reconstruct evolutionary changes that allowed us to incorporate a wide diversity of taxa for which there was no published phylogeny with branch lengths available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%