2002
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2001.6720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of CO on Titan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards N 2 , the factor ~1.5 enhancement in 15 N/ 14 N has been interpreted as due to non-thermal escape of N 2 (Lunine et al 1999) , and suggests that Titan's primitive atmosphere was 2-10 times thicker than nowadays (Niemann et al 2005) . A similar explanation, involving a massive loss of CO in Titan's early history, was put forward by Wong et al (2002) to explain the factor of ~2 higher than terrestrial 18 O/…”
Section: Isotope Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As regards N 2 , the factor ~1.5 enhancement in 15 N/ 14 N has been interpreted as due to non-thermal escape of N 2 (Lunine et al 1999) , and suggests that Titan's primitive atmosphere was 2-10 times thicker than nowadays (Niemann et al 2005) . A similar explanation, involving a massive loss of CO in Titan's early history, was put forward by Wong et al (2002) to explain the factor of ~2 higher than terrestrial 18 O/…”
Section: Isotope Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, even under this assumption, the OH fl uxes required to sustain the observed amounts of H 2 O and CO 2 fail to produce a ~ 40 ppm CO mixing ratio and the current chemical loss of CO exceeds its steady-state production by typically (1-2) × 10 6 cm −2 s −1 . The problem was exacerbated with the realization (Wong et al 2002) that the OH + CH 3 reaction essentially recycles water, leading to only ~2 ppm of CO in equilibrium. Suggestions to solve this dilemma included: (i) alternate external sources, such as CO contained in micrometeorites (Lara et al 1996) or delivered by cometary impacts , (ii) surface or internal sources such as oceanic evaporation or volcanic outgassing (Baines et al 2006) , and (iii) a CO abundance not in equilibrium and refl ecting a larger primordial abundance (Wong et al 2002 ;Wilson and Atreya 2004) .…”
Section: Minor Constituents -Oxygen Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possibility is that Hyperion is a significant source of dust (and hence oxygen) to Titan, as advocated by Banaszkiewicz and Krivov (1997). We finally note that in the case of Titan, photochemical models (Lara et al 1996, Wong et al 2002 require a large CO flux ((8-11) × 10 5 cm −2 s −1 ) in order to maintain the conservation of O atoms, adopting a ∼5 × 10 −5 CO mixing ratio. Evaporation from a surface ocean and steady meteoritic influx have been invoked to sustain this flux.…”
Section: Nonsl9 Oxygen In Jupiter's Stratospherementioning
confidence: 97%
“…12 Finally, PAHs are thought to be crucial building blocks leading to the formation of the orange-reddish haze layers on Saturn's moon Titan. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] But how are PAHs formed in these extreme environments? Multiple experimental studies have been completed in the last decades, where PAHs and nanosized soot particles were observed ranging from the hydrocarbon rich flame chemistry studies [22][23][24] to the shock wave experiment of Mimura 25 and the laser ablation experiment of graphite under different quenching atmospheres by Jäger et al 26 Chemical reaction networks that model the formation of PAHs in combustion flames [27][28][29] and in the interstellar medium 30 stress the importance of the phenylacetylene molecule (C 6 H 5 CCH) in the growth of PAHs starting from an initial hydrogen abstraction/acetylene addition sequence via the phenyl radical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%