2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.18.558261
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of cooperation in deme-structured populations on graphs

Alix Moawad,
Alia Abbara,
Anne-Florence Bitbol

Abstract: Understanding how cooperation can evolve in populations despite its cost to individual cooperators is an important challenge. Models of spatially structured populations with one individual per node of a graph have shown that cooperation, modeled via the prisoner’s dilemma, can be favored by natural selection. These results depend on microscopic update rules, which determine how birth, death and migration on the graph are coupled. Recently, we developed coarse-grained models of spatially structured populations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be interesting both theoretically and experimentally to consider longer evolutionary trajectories [58], and to include de novo mutants, which may appear at any time during the growth phase [5964]. Further extensions include addressing environmental gradients [6568], changing envi-ronments [69–75], possible deme extinctions [11], cooperative interactions [7678], and connecting to models of expanding populations [79, 80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting both theoretically and experimentally to consider longer evolutionary trajectories [58], and to include de novo mutants, which may appear at any time during the growth phase [5964]. Further extensions include addressing environmental gradients [6568], changing envi-ronments [69–75], possible deme extinctions [11], cooperative interactions [7678], and connecting to models of expanding populations [79, 80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%