1981
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.5953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of DNA sequence organization in mitochondrial genomes of Zea

Abstract: Molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of mtDNA in maize and three species of teosinte have been investigated. By using DNA transfer techniques and cloned fragments of maize mtDNA, changes in the position of homologous sequences in restriction digests were analyzed in related taxa. The resulting patterns indicate general conservation of sequence homology in all four species. One-third of the cloned fragments showed sequences conserved in homology and position of BamHI restriction fragments. Other fragme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial colonies were grown on nitrocellulose filters and treated by the method of Grunstein and Hogness (1975) with the modification of Sederoff et al (1981). Nitrocellulose filters were placed on 3 MM paper saturated with 0.5 M NaOH for 5 min and neutralized by transfer to 3 MM paper with 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, for 5 min.…”
Section: Colony Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial colonies were grown on nitrocellulose filters and treated by the method of Grunstein and Hogness (1975) with the modification of Sederoff et al (1981). Nitrocellulose filters were placed on 3 MM paper saturated with 0.5 M NaOH for 5 min and neutralized by transfer to 3 MM paper with 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, for 5 min.…”
Section: Colony Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of restriction patterns has revealed extensive variation in the structure of m t D N A from some closely related plant species [e.g., 47], and comparison of available gene maps [9,26,53] indicates that there is virtually no conservation of gene arrangement in plant mtDNA, with the exception of a close linkage of 18S and 5S rRNA genes [18]. In these respects, the plant mitochondrial genome is quite unlike its counterpart in vertebrate animals, which is small, shows little size variation, diverges in sequence at a relatively rapid rate within coding sequences, and has maintained an invariant gene order throughout 500 million years of chordate evolution [1,6,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of nuclear genes, interbreeding and genetic exchange obscure the evidence of past demographic patterns. In plants, mitochondrial genomes have not typically been useful for phylogenetic analysis due to a high rate of sequence reorganization (Sederoff et al, 1981;Wu, Krutovskii, and Strauss, 1998). Conifers often display minimal levels of differentiation among populations and high levels of genetic diversity at loci in the nuclear genome (Hamrick andGodt, 1990, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these organelles, effective population size is approximately one-half that of nuclear genes (McCauley, 1995) and, consequently, both the time to allele fixation within populations and response time to stochastic change are reduced. In plants, mitochondrial genomes have not typically been useful for phylogenetic analysis due to a high rate of sequence reorganization (Sederoff et al, 1981;Wu, Krutovskii, and Strauss, 1998). Mitochondrial haplotype diversity related to sequence rearrangement has, however, shown utility in population differentiation of pine and fir taxa (Strauss, Hong, and Hipkins, 1993;Tsumura and Suyama, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%