2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/482481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Equity Norms in Small‐World Networks

Abstract: The topology of interactions has been proved very influential in the results of models based on learning and evolutionary game theory. This paper is aimed at investigating the effect of structures ranging from regular ring lattices to random networks, including small-world networks, in a model focused on property distribution norms. The model considers a fixed and finite population of agents who play the Nash bargaining game repeatedly. Our results show that regular networks promote the emergence of the equity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature research by [17], Tidd [18], Porter [19], Cooke [20], and Jos' e I. Santos [21] et al shows that the theory of collaborative innovation has experienced a development process from shallow to deep and from point to point, from the collaborative research that is limited to the innovation elements within the enterprise to the interfirm collaborative innovation system based on the industrial chain division and cooperation (industrial cluster innovation), and then to the breakthrough of conceptual boundary of "enterprise as the agents, the academic institutions, governments, and financial institutions are all auxiliary and paying equal attention to the heterogeneous role of various innovation agents, and, finally, forming a regional network innovation pattern centered on industry, study, and research. That is to say, collaborative innovation is developed from the innovation of industrial clusters, but, compared with the cluster innovation network, the collaborative innovation network has a clearer level of difference in terms of the types of knowledge information.…”
Section: Collaborative Innovation Network Evolution Conceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature research by [17], Tidd [18], Porter [19], Cooke [20], and Jos' e I. Santos [21] et al shows that the theory of collaborative innovation has experienced a development process from shallow to deep and from point to point, from the collaborative research that is limited to the innovation elements within the enterprise to the interfirm collaborative innovation system based on the industrial chain division and cooperation (industrial cluster innovation), and then to the breakthrough of conceptual boundary of "enterprise as the agents, the academic institutions, governments, and financial institutions are all auxiliary and paying equal attention to the heterogeneous role of various innovation agents, and, finally, forming a regional network innovation pattern centered on industry, study, and research. That is to say, collaborative innovation is developed from the innovation of industrial clusters, but, compared with the cluster innovation network, the collaborative innovation network has a clearer level of difference in terms of the types of knowledge information.…”
Section: Collaborative Innovation Network Evolution Conceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spatial structure of agents interaction is limited on lattice or grid [9]. Recently, Santos et al [10] extend Axtell's model to study the equity norm emergence on the small world network and the diffusion of equity norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networks (Hearnshaw & Wilson 2013), Socio-ecological Systems (Janssen et al 2006) and Social Economy (Poza et al 2011;Santos et al 2012).…”
Section: Applications Of Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%