Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Emerging or diminishing nonlinear interactions in the evolution of a complex system may signal a possible structural change in its underlying mechanism. This type of structural break may exist in many applications, such as in climate and finance, and standard methods for change-point detection may not be sensitive to it. In this article, we present a novel scheme for detecting structural breaks through the occurrence or vanishing of nonlinear causal relationships in a complex system. A significance resampling test was developed for the null hypothesis (H0) of no nonlinear causal relationships using (a) an appropriate Gaussian instantaneous transform and vector autoregressive (VAR) process to generate the resampled multivariate time series consistent with H0; (b) the modelfree Granger causality measure of partial mutual information from mixed embedding (PMIME) to estimate all causal relationships; and (c) a characteristic of the network formed by PMIME as test statistic. The significance test was applied to sliding windows on the observed multivariate time series, and the change from rejection to no-rejection of H0, or the opposite, signaled a non-trivial change of the underlying dynamics of the observed complex system. Different network indices that capture different characteristics of the PMIME networks were used as test statistics. The test was evaluated on multiple synthetic complex and chaotic systems, as well as on linear and nonlinear stochastic systems, demonstrating that the proposed methodology is capable of detecting nonlinear causality. Furthermore, the scheme was applied to different records of financial indices regarding the global financial crisis of 2008, the two commodity crises of 2014 and 2020, the Brexit referendum of 2016, and the outbreak of COVID-19, accurately identifying the structural breaks at the identified times.
Emerging or diminishing nonlinear interactions in the evolution of a complex system may signal a possible structural change in its underlying mechanism. This type of structural break may exist in many applications, such as in climate and finance, and standard methods for change-point detection may not be sensitive to it. In this article, we present a novel scheme for detecting structural breaks through the occurrence or vanishing of nonlinear causal relationships in a complex system. A significance resampling test was developed for the null hypothesis (H0) of no nonlinear causal relationships using (a) an appropriate Gaussian instantaneous transform and vector autoregressive (VAR) process to generate the resampled multivariate time series consistent with H0; (b) the modelfree Granger causality measure of partial mutual information from mixed embedding (PMIME) to estimate all causal relationships; and (c) a characteristic of the network formed by PMIME as test statistic. The significance test was applied to sliding windows on the observed multivariate time series, and the change from rejection to no-rejection of H0, or the opposite, signaled a non-trivial change of the underlying dynamics of the observed complex system. Different network indices that capture different characteristics of the PMIME networks were used as test statistics. The test was evaluated on multiple synthetic complex and chaotic systems, as well as on linear and nonlinear stochastic systems, demonstrating that the proposed methodology is capable of detecting nonlinear causality. Furthermore, the scheme was applied to different records of financial indices regarding the global financial crisis of 2008, the two commodity crises of 2014 and 2020, the Brexit referendum of 2016, and the outbreak of COVID-19, accurately identifying the structural breaks at the identified times.
The present article examines the historical aspects of the origin and development of various economic crises existing in the world, which constantly raises an issue of finding ways out of the problem, before scientists-researchers. In this regard, the author reviews the views of the representatives of the classical school of different epochs on the elimination of crises. In addition, the author also analyzes the directions proposed by modern scientists, the most notable of which is the theory of the real economic cycle as an independent direction, which laid the foundation for the systematic study of the economic crisis. Moreover, a conclusion that the slowdown in output growth in market conditions is not due to market inefficiency, but is due to low rates of technological development, and economic cycles are caused by technological shocks is notable. Based on the above assumption, scientists presented an argument, that the market can restore equilibrium without an outside intervention. The cyclical nature of crises followed by economic stimulus is also analyzed.
It is essential to look at financial crises from both theoretical and practical aspects, as this is an old and recurring phenomenon. However, it is still unknown how to manage their formation. The article aims at assessing the influence of individuals’ financial decisions on financial crisis formation. The interface between economic decisions made by individuals and financial crises is assessed using expert evaluation method. The multi-criteria estimation performed using the TOPSIS method to evaluate when individuals make the most irrational decisions. Moreover, finally, economic decisions rationality index is concluded, evaluating when individuals make ridiculous decisions. The rationality index of economic decisions measures the number of irrational decisions during the economic expansion. Economic decisions rationality index divided into three groups: economic factors, financial sector and psychological factors. Assessment of the irrational decisions made during the economic expansion demonstrates that during the first period (2001–2006) the least irrational decisions were made in 2001 and the most in 2004; while during the second period (2010–2017), the least irrational decisions were made in 2011 and the most in 2015. The limitation of the research is that the data is accessible only for the US; hence, the results could differ in other countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.