1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19970415)277:6<417::aid-jez1>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of forelimb movement patterns for prey manipulation in anurans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
89
2
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
89
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Transition from mechanical pulling to inertial elongation could have involved, among others, a decrease in relative tongue mass (Nishikawa, 2000). Lepidobatrachus is mentioned as a mechanical puller that protrudes its tongue during terrestrial feeding (Nishikawa, 2000;O'Reilly et al, 2002), but during aquatic feeding uses only forearm scooping to capture prey (Gray et al, 1997;O'Reilly et al, 2002). Reduction of tongue mass in Chacophrys and Lepidobatrachus could be related to the evolution toward terrestrial feeding that diverges later within the clade formed by Chacophrys þ Lepidobatrachus with changes in the hyoglossal apparatus of Lepidobatrachus in which terrestrial feeding is lost (but not the capability).…”
Section: The Hyoglossal Apparatus In the Frog Lepidobatrachusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transition from mechanical pulling to inertial elongation could have involved, among others, a decrease in relative tongue mass (Nishikawa, 2000). Lepidobatrachus is mentioned as a mechanical puller that protrudes its tongue during terrestrial feeding (Nishikawa, 2000;O'Reilly et al, 2002), but during aquatic feeding uses only forearm scooping to capture prey (Gray et al, 1997;O'Reilly et al, 2002). Reduction of tongue mass in Chacophrys and Lepidobatrachus could be related to the evolution toward terrestrial feeding that diverges later within the clade formed by Chacophrys þ Lepidobatrachus with changes in the hyoglossal apparatus of Lepidobatrachus in which terrestrial feeding is lost (but not the capability).…”
Section: The Hyoglossal Apparatus In the Frog Lepidobatrachusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Reilly et al, (2002) discussed scenarios for the evolution of aquatic feeding in adult frogs, from which, based on distribution of aquatic behavior alone, it is plausible that aquatic foraging is a shared primitive character among many basal frogs. Forearm scooping to capture prey in water, as it was observed in Bombina, Lepidobatrachus, Calyptocephalella, Rana, Pipa, and Xenopus (Gray et al, 1997), appears to be an ancestral behavior used for prey transport, while tongue protrusion, jaw bending, and head flexion have evolved for terrestrial feeding (Nishikawa, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During feeding, they are used to manipulate and bring prey towards the mouth (Gray et al, 1997) and during wiping behavior, forelimb movements help to protect the skin by Anurans use a saltatorial (jumping) mode of locomotion. A jumping cycle can be divided into four subphases: propulsion, flight, landing and recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision grip is thought to be used during locomotion and in the manipulation of some food items. [2] Adductor pollicis (ADP) is described as having oblique and transverse heads. The oblique head arises from the capitate bone and the bases of the second and third metacarpal bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%