Proceedings of Baryons in Dark Matter Halos — PoS(BDMH2004) 2004
DOI: 10.22323/1.014.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of galaxies in clusters

Abstract: I summarize what is know about the evolution of galaxies in clusters from the observational point of view presenting results at high (z comment on the comparison between observations and predictions of CDM models, highlighting the observational landmarks more relevant for this comparison, such as the establishment and evolution of the morphology-density relation, the Butcher-Oemler effect, the evolution of red galaxies/ellipticals, the star formation histories of galaxies in clusters, the downsizing effect and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation is that local processes (e.g., galaxy-scale interaction) affect star formation activities, rather than the global processes (like ram-pressure stripping within the cluster-scale environment). This result again proves the correctness of the morphology-density relation pointed out by Dressler (1980), which can be well explained in the context of the hierarchical cosmological scenario (Poggianti 2004).…”
Section: Star Formation Properties Of Cluster Galaxiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…An alternative explanation is that local processes (e.g., galaxy-scale interaction) affect star formation activities, rather than the global processes (like ram-pressure stripping within the cluster-scale environment). This result again proves the correctness of the morphology-density relation pointed out by Dressler (1980), which can be well explained in the context of the hierarchical cosmological scenario (Poggianti 2004).…”
Section: Star Formation Properties Of Cluster Galaxiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Panel (a) shows that the galaxies in the outer region are likely to have longer SFR time scales than those in the core region. Considering that late-type galaxies tend to have longer time scales of star formation, our result is consistent with the morphology-density relation first pointed out by Dressler (1980), which can be explained well in the context of the hierarchical cosmological scenario (Poggianti 2004). As shown in the panels (c) and (d), the outlier member galaxies are likely to possess younger stellar populations, resulting in a smaller mean stellar age weighted by either mass or light.…”
Section: Star Formation Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As all galaxies in A98 have the same distance modulus, the apparent magnitudes could reflect their intrinsic luminosities. For bright and massive cluster galaxies in the core region of A98, their star formation activities have been reduced by some physical processes via environmental effects, such as galaxy-galaxy interaction, harassment, gas stripping, or strangulation (Poggianti 2004;Yuan et al 2005), which leads to a short SFR time scale. From Figure 11(b) and Figure 12(b), no bright (m h < 16.5) and no central (Σ > 0.4 gal.…”
Section: Star Formation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms effect the gas either by stimulating star formation (which rapidly consumes the gas, locking it up in stars) or by removing the gas from the galaxy (and ionising it) or by preventing further accretion. Unlike the other mechanisms listed which quench star formation relatively quickly (∼10 7 years), strangulation causes a slow decline in star formation over longer timescales (>1 Gyr) (Poggianti 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The amount of star formation in galaxies in general increases with redshift, with there being an order of magnitude increase in the cosmic star formation rate density between the present time and z ∼ 1 (Lilly et al 1996;Madau et al 1996;Hopkins 2004). The trend that with higher galaxy density there are fewer galaxies with ongoing star formation continues to at least z ∼ 0.8 (Poggianti et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%