2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of growth by genetic accommodation in Icelandic freshwater stickleback

Abstract: Classical Darwinian adaptation to a change in environment can ensue when selection favours beneficial genetic variation. How plastic trait responses to new conditions affect this process depends on how plasticity reveals to selection the influence of genotype on phenotype. Genetic accommodation theory predicts that evolutionary rate may sharply increase when a new environment induces plastic responses and selects on sufficient genetic variation in those responses to produce an immediate evolutionary response, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crispo (2008) suggests that positive correlation between genetically based bias in phenotypes and plasticity may contribute to initial phenotypic divergence followed by genetic changes in the direction of the plastic response. This view is corroborated by empirical studies showing that populations colonizing new environments often possess or evolve high degrees of plasticity relatively quickly (Svanbäck and Schluter 2012;Robinson 2013) or that plastic responses to novel environmental conditions can produce evolutionary innovations (Moczek et al 2011). In total, this study substantiates the function and significance of the environmental and genetic bases of phenotypic diversity for divergent evolution and ecological speciation.…”
Section: Implications Of Developmental Shifts On Divergencesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Crispo (2008) suggests that positive correlation between genetically based bias in phenotypes and plasticity may contribute to initial phenotypic divergence followed by genetic changes in the direction of the plastic response. This view is corroborated by empirical studies showing that populations colonizing new environments often possess or evolve high degrees of plasticity relatively quickly (Svanbäck and Schluter 2012;Robinson 2013) or that plastic responses to novel environmental conditions can produce evolutionary innovations (Moczek et al 2011). In total, this study substantiates the function and significance of the environmental and genetic bases of phenotypic diversity for divergent evolution and ecological speciation.…”
Section: Implications Of Developmental Shifts On Divergencesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Such evolutionary increases in phenotypic plasticity during rapid increases of a novel selection pressure are predicted by theory (Lande ; Crispo et al . ; Robinson ). For five other traits (the four size traits, and relative spine length at maturity), the direction of ancestral plasticity (slope of the ancestral sub‐population reaction norm) was, however, maladaptive at the sub‐population level and for each of these traits plasticity had to evolve to arrive at an adaptive slope of the sub‐population reaction norm (Ghalambor et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ). In addition, differences in growth rate and growth rate plasticity exist between marine and freshwater stickleback raised in fresh water vs. salt water (Robinson ). However, no previous studies have explicitly assessed how conditions during winter in fresh water impact growth in stickleback ecotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stickleback, several studies have provided strong evidence showing that selection on growth probably played a role in the evolution of the prominent differences between marine and freshwater stickleback ecotypes (Marchinko & Schluter 2007;Barrett et al 2008Barrett et al , 2009). In addition, differences in growth rate and growth rate plasticity exist between marine and freshwater stickleback raised in fresh water vs. salt water (Robinson 2013). However, no previous studies have explicitly assessed how conditions during winter in fresh water impact growth in stickleback ecotypes.…”
Section: Growth Differences Between Stickleback Ecotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%