1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.869230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of large eddies in compressible shear layers

Abstract: The evolution of large turbulent eddies has been investigated in seven supersonic shear layers with average convective Mach numbers M c ranging from 0.22 to 0.86 and with large variation in density and velocity ratios. A two-laser, single-detector planar laser-induced fluorescence technique was used to visualize the flow and its evolution. Two-dimensional pattern matching yielded the convective velocity of the eddies. For M c Ͼ0.3, fast and slow modes of eddy propagation were detected in supersonic-subsonic an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
45
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that the present study yields temporal linear growth rates, whereas experiments measure the spatial growth of the mixing layer. Our results and those of Papamoschou & Bunyajitradulya (1996) indicate a distinct lack of interaction between eddies in supersonic shear layers. Their slow evolution may be due a combinations of decreased growth rates and this lack of interaction.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We remark that the present study yields temporal linear growth rates, whereas experiments measure the spatial growth of the mixing layer. Our results and those of Papamoschou & Bunyajitradulya (1996) indicate a distinct lack of interaction between eddies in supersonic shear layers. Their slow evolution may be due a combinations of decreased growth rates and this lack of interaction.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, the plan views from Papamoschou & Bunyajitradulya (1996) show that the chaotic patterns reveal every possible oblique angle to the free-stream flow. A possible explanation for this may be found in figures 13(a), 9 and 12.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticipating our discussion later on, we first define a key compressibility parameter; the convective Mach number M c = ⌬U / ͑a 1 + a 2 ͒, where ⌬U is the velocity change across the initial constant-pressure mixing shear layer, and a 1 and a 2 are the corresponding speeds of sound. The convective Mach number is considered as an appropriate parameter to scale the effects of compressibility in supersonic shear flows, and even though a single parameter may not be universally applicable, 34 it is still considered a useful parameter to delineate the effects of compressibility and will be used for this purpose in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work on turbulent mixing-layers was done by Elliott et al (1995) who used single and double pulsed visualizations to track the evolution of the largescale structures. In their work, Papamoschou & Bunyajitradulya (1996) addressed the following observations: For increasing convective Mach number, not only does the growth rate of the shear layer decline but the turbulence becomes less organized (shows less 2-D coherence) and 3-D disturbances become more amplified. Some analytical work, validated with numerical simulations, was done by Sarkar et al (1991) who focused on the effect of the dilatational terms on compressible turbulence.…”
Section: Coherent Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%