2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of lattice strain in Ti–6Al–4V during tensile loading at room temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is also at variance with the results of Liu et al 19 who used a fixed tool rotational speed of 400 rev min 21 and feedrates between 25 and 100 mm min 21 and observed steadily increasing tensile strength as feedrate increased. Joint efficiencies in the present work are higher than the peak value (0?90) reported in Ref.…”
Section: Tensile Testingcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…This finding is also at variance with the results of Liu et al 19 who used a fixed tool rotational speed of 400 rev min 21 and feedrates between 25 and 100 mm min 21 and observed steadily increasing tensile strength as feedrate increased. Joint efficiencies in the present work are higher than the peak value (0?90) reported in Ref.…”
Section: Tensile Testingcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…[27,28] Full Debye-Scherrer diffraction rings were collected from the monochromated X-ray beam (300 9 300 lm, k = 0.14291 Å ) every 2 seconds by a Pixium 4700 2D area detector. Thermal cycling was achieved by resistance heating using an Instron electrothermal mechanical tester (ETMT), [29,30] controlled by an R-type thermocouple, spot welded to the sample directly above the X-ray beam. The heating and cooling rate used throughout the experiment was~1°C s À1 from room temperature to 140°C for TiNi and to 85°C for TiNiCu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the interaction between particles in the matrix phase and the surrounding has been simulated quantitatively for TC4, which means that the load distribution in the matrix phase is more complicated than that in the inclusion phase. Table 4 shows the values of the crystal plane diffraction elastic constant of matrix phase E M hkl , and the inclusion phase E C hkl , respectively, compared with those reported in the literature [43]. In Equation 30, the mechanical elastic modulus of α-Ti is clearly different from the diffraction elastic modulus related to the crystal plane orientation.…”
Section: Calculation Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%