2010
DOI: 10.1680/geot.8.p.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of microstructure in compacted London Clay during wetting and loading

Abstract: The influence of fabric on mechanical behaviour is explicitly considered in some of the current constitutive models for unsaturated soils. These are based on assumptions regarding the interaction between different levels of structure, which still require experimental validation. A study has been carried out to investigate the evolution of fabric in a compacted natural clay during wetting and loading, and the results are presented in this paper. Samples of London Clay were statically compacted to the same initi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
81
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
15
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). In addition, microstructural studies have reported that the soil fabric during drying is also evolving into a more constricted porosity centred at the microporosity range, although it recovers some of the macroporosity when it is subsequently wetted (Cuisinier & Laloui, 2004;Monroy et al, 2010). These results are also consistent with the small strain shear modulus studies on decomposed tuff and Bonny silt conducted by Ng & Xu (2012) and Khosravi & McCartney (2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8). In addition, microstructural studies have reported that the soil fabric during drying is also evolving into a more constricted porosity centred at the microporosity range, although it recovers some of the macroporosity when it is subsequently wetted (Cuisinier & Laloui, 2004;Monroy et al, 2010). These results are also consistent with the small strain shear modulus studies on decomposed tuff and Bonny silt conducted by Ng & Xu (2012) and Khosravi & McCartney (2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As illustrated in past literature through computed tomography and mercury intrusion techniques, the soil structure would also change from a predominantly aggregated assembly on the dry side of OMC to a more matrix-dominated macrostructure on the wet side of OMC (e.g. Delage et al, 1996;Monroy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was soon accepted that water was trapped inside the clay aggregations, even if the mixture remained relatively dry. These ideas have been widely confirmed by subsequent studies (Delage et al, 1996;Romero & Simms, 2008;Lee & Zhang, 2009;Monroy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, this is not always the case. Wetting tests reported by Monroy et al (2010) on statically compacted high-plasticity London Clay indicate that changes in micropores may also be significant on wetting. The higher activity of the clay probably explains the enhanced sensitivity of microporosity to suction changes.…”
Section: Microstructure and Compacted Soil Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Detailed descriptions of the mechanical and water retention aspects related to the evolving nature of the microstructure of compacted double-porosity clayey soils can be found elsewhere (e.g. [4,6,19,46,52]). Finally, anisotropy of soil behaviour is not considered in the paper, with the aim of focusing on saturation and de-saturation processes in soils without important direction-dependent response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%