Evolution of national climate adaptation agendas in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia: the role of national leadership and international donors

Abstract

In this paper, we use an inductive approach and longitudinal analysis to explore political influences on the emergence and evolution of climate change adaptation policy and planning at national level, as well as the institutions within which it is embedded, for three countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia). Data collection involved quantitative and qualitative methods applied over a 6-year period from 2012 to 2017. This included a survey of 103 government staff (20 in Malawi, 29 in Tanzania and 54 in Zambia) and 242 interviews (106 in Malawi, 86 in Tanzania and 50 in Zambia) with a wide range of stakeholders, many of whom were interviewed multiple times over the study period, together with content analysis of relevant policy and programme documents. Whilst the climate adaptation agenda emerged in all three countries around 2007–2009, associated with multilateral funding initiatives, the rate and nature of progress has varied—until roughly 2015 when, for different reasons, momentum slowed. We find differences between the countries in terms of specifics of how they operated, but roles of two factors in common emerge in the evolution of the climate change adaptation agendas: national leadership and allied political priorities, and the role of additional funding provided by donors. These influences lead to changes in the policy and institutional frameworks for addressing climate change, as well as in the emphasis placed on climate change adaptation. By examining the different ways through which ideas, power and resources converge and by learning from the specific configurations in the country examples, we identify opportunities to address existing barriers to action and thus present implications that enable more effective adaptation planning in other countries. We show that more socially just and inclusive national climate adaptation planning requires a critical approach to understanding these configurations of power and politics.

Lack of Cross-Sector and Cross-Level Policy Coherence and Consistency Limits Urban Green Infrastructure Implementation in Malawi

“…A wide range of national-level government departments can, and should, be engaged in the process of creating and enhancing green infrastructure with the participation of city residents. However, as is common in many countries, restructuring of ministries, frequent transfer of technical experts between portfolios, and a weak relationship between research outputs and policymakers limit the development of evidencebased policy, hindering how policy, and policymakers engage with emerging issues (Pardoe et al, 2020). Facilitating effective environmental mainstreaming requires therefore that vertical and horizontal policy arrangements are combined (Lafferty and Hovden, 2003).…”

Stress-testing development pathways under a changing climate: water-energy-food security in the lake Malawi-Shire river system

“…Infrastructure and large-scale agriculture-led development narratives are common in sub-Saharan Africa [ 14 , 15 ] and exert an important influence on investment patterns and national and multi-lateral priorities for development. While the origins, implementation and outcomes of such programmes are contested [ 16 ] recent increases in investment and infrastructure construction underscore the need for rigorous planning and recognition of the inter-dependencies that exist across scales and sectors and to explicitly evaluate climate resilience of such long-term investments (e.g. [ 17 ]).…”

Evaluating Climate-Smart Agriculture as Route to Building Climate Resilience in African Food Systems

“…Soil studies in Malawi over the last decade have been undertaken in conjunction with a larger-scale programme of climate change and food system resilience research and policy advocacy. This has enabled many benefits in terms of framing the importance of soil science studies in relation to the broader national and regional pressures of climate change [25], water resource management [26], and cross-sectoral planning for climate adaptation and resilience [27]. Given the underpinning nature of soil health to agricultural production systems, researchers from other disciplines recognised the inherent value in soils studies as enabling the "localisation" of broader modelling studies and to ensure a "farmer-centred framing of food systems".…”