2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3007774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Netted Radar Systems

Abstract: The netted radar systems are known for being able to provide higher target detection probabilities, more accurate measurements, and better multi-target tracking performance than the monostatic/bistatic radar systems by exploiting information fusion processing. Simple radar networks made of multiple independent monostatic radars with decentralized processing have been around for several decades. In contrast, sophisticated radar networks with centralized data fusion only emerged during the last few years thanks … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…base stations of wireless communications systems) for target detection, imaging, and tracking, which could increase the radar coverage area while avoiding the high infrastructure cost and the spectrum-crowdedness caused by the construction of new dedicated radar transmitters. However, since the waveforms from the IOs are usually unknown to radar receivers, the performance of passive radar is usually much worse than the conventional active radar [42]. In [43]- [44], DL was used to realize simultaneous waveform estimation and image reconstruction for passive SAR composed of a ground-based IO at known position and an airborne receiver.…”
Section: B DL For Passive Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…base stations of wireless communications systems) for target detection, imaging, and tracking, which could increase the radar coverage area while avoiding the high infrastructure cost and the spectrum-crowdedness caused by the construction of new dedicated radar transmitters. However, since the waveforms from the IOs are usually unknown to radar receivers, the performance of passive radar is usually much worse than the conventional active radar [42]. In [43]- [44], DL was used to realize simultaneous waveform estimation and image reconstruction for passive SAR composed of a ground-based IO at known position and an airborne receiver.…”
Section: B DL For Passive Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing studies on the centralized approach assume a PMR without using reference channels which is mainly the case of passive airborne radar, where the radar platform moves and prevents establishing a stationary direct-path between the transmitters and the receiver. In such a circumstance, the cross-correlation between the received signals of various receivers is used to detect and localize targets [11]. For example in [12], a multistatic passive radar was considered with a single transmitter and multiple receivers without reference channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remedy this issue, many researchers have proposed the use of orthogonal waveforms in modern radar systems. The representative system adopting orthogonal waveforms is the Spectrum Shared Radar System (SSRS), where multiple radars in close proximity share the same frequency band as depicted in Figure 1 [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. To estimate a target’s characteristics accurately in the SSRS, each radar must operate independently using a waveform that does not interfere with other radar signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%