2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of porosity in the high-burnup fuel structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For average burnup 10 MW·days/kg the energy release in a 100 µm thick peripheral layer is 30% higher than the average value over the pellet. These results agree with the experimental data of [8], where it is shown that for average burnup 105 MW·days/kg the local burnup in a thin layer near the surface of a fuel pellet is three times higher than the average burnup.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…For average burnup 10 MW·days/kg the energy release in a 100 µm thick peripheral layer is 30% higher than the average value over the pellet. These results agree with the experimental data of [8], where it is shown that for average burnup 105 MW·days/kg the local burnup in a thin layer near the surface of a fuel pellet is three times higher than the average burnup.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Formation of fission-gas bubbles all over the surface of the pellet. When compared with other high burnup fuel results [6][7][8], the state and extent of the HBS is far less advanced here. The thickness of the (completely developed) HBS, for instance, is about 92 µm at 83 GWd/tU, whereas more than 350 µm has been reported elsewhere [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The radial extent of this lower density peripheral region ($1 mm) seems to correspond to the high-burnup-structure region, with high porosity, as reported elsewhere. 23) Furthermore, because transmission tomography can be used in combination with emission tomography, a linear attenuation coefficient matrix was derived, to be employed in the emission reconstruction process, so as to increase the final image accuracy. This work has been already carried out 14) and will be presented separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial extent of the lower density peripheral region ($1 mm) appears to correspond to a high-burnup-structure region with a much higher level of porosity such that it yields a lower overall density. 23) The uncertainty (1) in the central region is <0:7%, whilst the periphery is characterised by higher values (1.2%-2.5%, depending on the sample). These uncertainties, for the two distinct regions, central and peripheral, were derived from the results of a sensitivity study carried out as follows: First, noise was introduced into the input sinograms, so as to derive new sinograms using the relation…”
Section: Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 95%