Mammalian Protein Metabolism 1969
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Protein Molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
6,749
1
45

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9,266 publications
(6,813 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
18
6,749
1
45
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analyses were performed with MEGA5 (Tamura et al, 2011). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Jukes-Cantor model (Jukes and Cantor, 1969) and the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. In total, 1000 bootstrap replications were performed to test for branch robustness.…”
Section: Physiological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analyses were performed with MEGA5 (Tamura et al, 2011). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Jukes-Cantor model (Jukes and Cantor, 1969) and the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. In total, 1000 bootstrap replications were performed to test for branch robustness.…”
Section: Physiological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences were aligned with ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/). Unrooted phylogenetic trees were constructed using a matrix of Jukes-Cantor distances [29] and the neighbor-joining method of Saito and Nei [54] with PHYLIP, version 3.5 [17]. A bootstrap analysis was conducted to test the reliability of the tree [16] using SEQBOOT (PHYLIP, version 3.5).…”
Section: S Rdna Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In place of the linear birthshift-death process model for transposons, appropriate genotype evolution models might be inserted for markers of interest. For DNA sequences, nucleotide substitution models might be used (Jukes and Cantor, 1969;Li, 1997, for example). The probability of an observed DNA sequence at time t given the initial DNA sequence and the sampling interval is then easily computed.…”
Section: Other Types Of Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%