1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01196192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of pseudo-arrhenotoky

Abstract: Evolution of pseudo-arrhenotokySabelis, M.W.; Nagelkerke, C.J. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On both prey, sex ratio of the progeny of the mites reared at the diVerent temperatures was higher than 75% [females/(females + males)] at 20, 25 and 30°C, but only 57.5% on T. evansi at 15°C, suggesting a possible disturbance of the pseudo-arrhenotoky process of predators reared at relatively low temperature and fed an apparently unfavorable prey, resulting in the production of a proportionally higher number of sons (Sabelis and Nagelkerke 1988). Takahashi and Chant (1994) and Fraga (1996) reported sex ratios of about 80% for this predator.…”
Section: Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On both prey, sex ratio of the progeny of the mites reared at the diVerent temperatures was higher than 75% [females/(females + males)] at 20, 25 and 30°C, but only 57.5% on T. evansi at 15°C, suggesting a possible disturbance of the pseudo-arrhenotoky process of predators reared at relatively low temperature and fed an apparently unfavorable prey, resulting in the production of a proportionally higher number of sons (Sabelis and Nagelkerke 1988). Takahashi and Chant (1994) and Fraga (1996) reported sex ratios of about 80% for this predator.…”
Section: Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In many species, however, adults do not disperse from their natal patch and mate among siblings (Masters et al, 1994;Avilés & Gelsey, 1998;Bilde et al, 2005;de Luca & Cocroft, 2008). Females in these resident mating aggregations adjust the sex ratio of their progeny to reduce local mate competition (Sabelis & Nagelkerke, 1988;Masters et al, 1994;Nagelkerke & Sabelis, 1998;West et al, 2005). The evolutionary transition between mating systems characterized by pre-reproductive adult dispersal or resident inbred mating (Avilés & Gelsey, 1998;Bilde et al, 2005;Agnarsson et al, 2006) possibly illustrates the cost of adult dispersal in terms of female mating failure.…”
Section: Female Flightlessness and Constrained Mating Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, sex allocation theory predicts a 1:1 sex ratio. Experiments on different mite species confirm this prediction (Sabelis 1985, Sabelis and Nagelkerke 1988, Nagelkerke and Sabelis 1998, Toyoshima and Amano 1998). Therefore, we assumed a 1:1 sex ratio at low prey densities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%