2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04143-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of recommender system over the time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in Equations ( 2) and ( 3) is generally found using different techniques such as cosine, jaccard, 18 Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) 19 etc. In the Graph k-medoids approach, based on the number of hops between nodes, all the nodes in the graph are assigned to the nearest center and the process continues until the cluster converges.…”
Section: K-medoid Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Equations ( 2) and ( 3) is generally found using different techniques such as cosine, jaccard, 18 Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) 19 etc. In the Graph k-medoids approach, based on the number of hops between nodes, all the nodes in the graph are assigned to the nearest center and the process continues until the cluster converges.…”
Section: K-medoid Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative filtering (CF) approach recommends the items to the target user on the basis of his past preferences, and filtering out other users with similar behaviors [Villegas et al 2018, Sinha andDhanalakshmi 2019]. For the CF recommendation method, the user profile is built by filtering information from the user's behaviors like ratings, assigned tags and comments or implicitly rating by liking the items.…”
Section: Recommender System Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the selected neighbourhood by HAR-KNN is similar to achieving the target products by the traditional methods. Moreover, the accuracy of the recall, F1 measure, and precision are computed to rate the relevant products and number of recommendations that were set to [2,4,6,8,10,12]. Therefore, the HAR-KNN provides better RS with better predictive accuracy than existing methods for the Amazon dataset.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional retail can present only popular products, but online can present a variety of products. Due to the enormous information available across the web, it is difficult for users to comprehend whether the items presented by recommender frameworks are accurate or not [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%