2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-019-1490-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Relative Drifts in the Expanding Solar Wind: Helios Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending this instability analysis to large sets of measurements that characterize the proton core, proton beam, and α components at 1 au, in the inner heliosphere (e.g. the recently reprocessed ion dataset from Durovcová et al (2019)), and at much closer radial distances (e.g. with Parker Solar Probe (Fox et al 2015)), will be necessary to improve our understanding of waveparticle interactions in the inner heliosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending this instability analysis to large sets of measurements that characterize the proton core, proton beam, and α components at 1 au, in the inner heliosphere (e.g. the recently reprocessed ion dataset from Durovcová et al (2019)), and at much closer radial distances (e.g. with Parker Solar Probe (Fox et al 2015)), will be necessary to improve our understanding of waveparticle interactions in the inner heliosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the constant temperature profile can be consistent with the solar wind turbulent heating. Under assumptions that 1) the heat needed for the non-adiabatic cooling of the solar wind is provided by the turbulent cascade and 2) the cooling rate does not depend on the temperature, the amount of the heat needed for the observed cooling rate T(r) ∝ r 0.8 [37,50] should increase with a temperature. The temperature increases across the shock by a factor of 4 (Figure 10) and thus the amount of heat that should be provided by the turbulent cascade to keep the same rate of non-adiabatic cooling should increase by a similar factor.…”
Section: Figure 9 |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 demonstrates the proton beam effect on the temperature determination. The left-hand panel shows 2D cut through the fit of Helios measurements [12] on 11 March 1976 at 0302 UT. The velocities of the proton core (615 km/s) and beam (665 km/s) are distinguished by a small diamond and a large rectangle, respectively.…”
Section: Temperature Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their T and T ⊥ are not a function the magnetic field direction, we can believe that their parameters are good estimates of real T and T ⊥ of the proton core. Furthermore, also Durovcova et al [12] reprocessed the VDFs measured by Helios and discussed evolutions of relative drifts between three dominant components-the proton core, proton beam, and α-particle core at different distances from the Sun. The processing is based on assumptions that partial VDFs of all these components can be approximated by a bi-Maxwellian distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%