2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-017-0798-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of scalar and velocity dynamics in planar shock-turbulence interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Reynolds stresses, large-scale turbulent variables, the multi-fluid flow reaches a quasi-isotropic state immediately after the shock wave (b 11 ≈ 0.0), while single-fluid turbulence exhibits a tendency towards an axisymmetric state. This is in good agreement with Boukharfane et al (2018). Evidently, the variable density effects on the post-shock turbulence appear differently at small and large scales.…”
Section: Evolution Of Turbulence State Downstream Of the Shocksupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Reynolds stresses, large-scale turbulent variables, the multi-fluid flow reaches a quasi-isotropic state immediately after the shock wave (b 11 ≈ 0.0), while single-fluid turbulence exhibits a tendency towards an axisymmetric state. This is in good agreement with Boukharfane et al (2018). Evidently, the variable density effects on the post-shock turbulence appear differently at small and large scales.…”
Section: Evolution Of Turbulence State Downstream Of the Shocksupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2013; Boukharfane et al. 2018). More importantly, the vortex tubes also become aligned with the density iso-surfaces, meaning that the vorticity becomes perpendicular to the density gradient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 4 we show streamwise profiles of the dilatational term A, the turbulent diffusion term C and the scalar dissipation rate term E. The latter dominates, in agreement with Tian et al (2017), while all three terms increase across the shock. Tian et al 2017did not perform a parametric study of different terms in (3.1), while Boukharfane et al (2018) only studied the effects of M (for 1.7, 2.0 and 2.3) on the scalar dissipation term. Dilatational and turbulent diffusion terms reach about ten percent of the scalar dissipation rate term downstream of the shock, in contrast to the results of Tian et al 2017, who found these two terms to be negligible for the mixing of passive scalars, but not for multi-fluid mixing.…”
Section: Scalar Variance Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity and orientation of both strain and vorticity may be altered, which eventually plays on the growth rate and alignment of scalar gradients. Through the velocity gradient, mass density gradients may thus influence the mixing process, a phenomenon addressed in compressible turbulence [1,2] and in turbulent flames [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%