2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the 2011 Mt. Etna ash and SO2 lava fountain episodes using SEVIRI data and VPR retrieval approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not consider the 19 September 2011 and 08 October 2011 episodes due to cloudy weather. Moreover, for the LF of 12 January 2011, we used the plume height reported in Calvari et al (2011); for the LF of 23 October 2011, we considered the plume height measured by SEVIRI and reported in Guerrieri et al (2015); for the LF of 23 November 2013, we considered the height inferred by Corradini et al (2016) by using a multi-sensor approach considering different satellite instruments such as Meteosat, MODIS and SEVIRI, and finally for the four events of the VOR of 3-5 December 2015, we used the plume heights reported in Vulpiani et al (2016), obtained by three radar systems (at C and X band) operated by the Italian Department of Civil Protection ( Table 4). The relationship between H F and H P has some limitations.…”
Section: Lava Fountain Average Height Vs Plume Maximum Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not consider the 19 September 2011 and 08 October 2011 episodes due to cloudy weather. Moreover, for the LF of 12 January 2011, we used the plume height reported in Calvari et al (2011); for the LF of 23 October 2011, we considered the plume height measured by SEVIRI and reported in Guerrieri et al (2015); for the LF of 23 November 2013, we considered the height inferred by Corradini et al (2016) by using a multi-sensor approach considering different satellite instruments such as Meteosat, MODIS and SEVIRI, and finally for the four events of the VOR of 3-5 December 2015, we used the plume heights reported in Vulpiani et al (2016), obtained by three radar systems (at C and X band) operated by the Italian Department of Civil Protection ( Table 4). The relationship between H F and H P has some limitations.…”
Section: Lava Fountain Average Height Vs Plume Maximum Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the measurements from the MSG-SEVIRI and Aqua-MODIS satellites were used to retrieve volcanic ash cloud parameters (M a , AOD, R e ) using the volcanic plume removal (VPR) algorithm [20,21].…”
Section: Geostationary and Polar Orbiting Satellite Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high data frequency of the SEVIRI images (every 15 or 5 min) can be exploited to retrieve wind speed and direction of the volcanic clouds for each event [34]. These terms were derived by applying the following steps:  retrieval of the ash abundance map from a given SEVIRI image [34];  identification of the ash cloud centre of mass;  computation of the ash centre of mass distance from the top of the volcano and the angle relative to the North. The previous three steps are repeated for some subsequent SEVIRI images (at least 2-3 h from the start of the eruption).…”
Section: Vpth By Using the Tracking Of The Ash Cloud Center Of Mass Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high data frequency of the SEVIRI images (every 15 or 5 min) can be exploited to retrieve wind speed and direction of the volcanic clouds for each event [34]. These terms were derived by applying the following steps:…”
Section: Vpth By Using the Tracking Of The Ash Cloud Center Of Mass Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation