1997
DOI: 10.1086/118231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the Galaxy Population Based on Photometric Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a photometric redshift study of galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field (HDF). The method of determining redshifts from broadband colors is described, and the dangers inherent in using it to estimate redshifts, particularly at very high z, are discussed. In particular, the need for accurate high-z spectral energy distributions is illustrated. The validity of our photometric redshift technique is demonstrated both by direct verification with available HDF spectroscopic data and by c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
209
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
18
209
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison between our set of undisturbed, chemically consistent galaxy models E through Sd over the redshift range from z > 4 through z > ∼ 0 and the Hubble Deep Field North (HDF-N) galaxies with photometric redshifts from Sawicki et al (1997) was presented in Bicker et al (2004). We recall that the agreement between our chemically consistent models, which account for the increasing metallicities of successive stellar generations, and the data was much better than for any earlier models using solar metallicity input physics alone.…”
Section: Motivation For the Study Of Starburst And Post-starburst Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between our set of undisturbed, chemically consistent galaxy models E through Sd over the redshift range from z > 4 through z > ∼ 0 and the Hubble Deep Field North (HDF-N) galaxies with photometric redshifts from Sawicki et al (1997) was presented in Bicker et al (2004). We recall that the agreement between our chemically consistent models, which account for the increasing metallicities of successive stellar generations, and the data was much better than for any earlier models using solar metallicity input physics alone.…”
Section: Motivation For the Study Of Starburst And Post-starburst Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HDF data of Madau et al (1996) at 0.15 at z > 2, is difficult to use for our purpose here because of the effects of extinction which may range from a factor of ∼ 3 (Pettini et al 1997b) to as much as a factor of ∼ 15 (Meurer 1997). For completeness, we also compare our results with the HDF data of Sawicki et al (1997) which are at the slightly different wavelengths of 0.3 and 0.45 µm (we will ignore this difference with the other data) and in the redshift bins, 0.2 -0.5, 0.5 -1.0, 1 -2, 2 -3, and 3 -4.…”
Section: Results Confronted To Photometric Observationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As indicated in section 1, we compare the results of our model calculations to the high redshift data of Lilly et al (1996), Connolly et al (1997), and Sawicki et al (1997). Lilly et al used the CFRS galaxy sample for which both redshift and B,V,K and I band photometry was available.…”
Section: Results Confronted To Photometric Observationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imaging follow-up observations of Lyman-limit systems have in turn yielded views of systems at z > 2 . Because of their unprecedented depth, and intensive spectroscopic and photometric redshift follow-ups (Cohen et al 1996;Lanzetta et al 1996;Mobasher et al 1996;Phillips et al 1997;Sawicki et al 1997), Hubble Deep Field observation of faint galaxy morphology are the likely to yield the greatest insights into evolving distribution of morphological types at high redshifts for some time to come van den Bergh et al 1996;Bouwens et al 1997;Guzman et al 1997). Eagerly anticipated are the results from high-resolution infrared observations in the HDF with NICMOS, and forthcoming observations of the HDF South.…”
Section: Hst Field Surveys With Morphological Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%