2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the magnetic field in magnetars

Abstract: We use numerical MHD to look at the stability of a possible poloidal field in neutron stars (Flowers & Ruderman 1977, ApJ, 215, 302), and follow its unstable evolution, which leads to the complete decay of the field. We then model a neutron star after the formation of a solid crust of high conductivity. As the initial magnetic field we use the stable "twisted torus" field which was the result of our earlier work (Braithwaite & Nordlund 2006, A&A, 450, 1077, since this field is likely to exist in the interior o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
182
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
182
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We clearly find that the initial simple magnetic field configuration is completely destroyed by the instability, leaving instead a complex non-axisymmetric field with rather small-scale structures very extended in latitude. This is very close to what Braithwaite & Spruit (2006) reported in their models of the instability of a poloidal field in a neutron star. They initiated their models with a different initial field configuration, inspired from the work of Flowers & Ruderman (1977) where the field is uniform in the domain and matches a potential field outside.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We clearly find that the initial simple magnetic field configuration is completely destroyed by the instability, leaving instead a complex non-axisymmetric field with rather small-scale structures very extended in latitude. This is very close to what Braithwaite & Spruit (2006) reported in their models of the instability of a poloidal field in a neutron star. They initiated their models with a different initial field configuration, inspired from the work of Flowers & Ruderman (1977) where the field is uniform in the domain and matches a potential field outside.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this timescale assumes that the dynamo is at saturation, whereas in reality it may take rather longer than this timescale just to reach saturation. This should, in any case, happen faster than τ KH , so this mechanism should dissipate shear energy on a timescale shorter than the thermal timescale on which pre-MS stars evolve (see Braithwaite & Spruit 2014). Consequently, we can expect it to work continuously and efficiently as the convective envelope retreats outward and to keep the radiative zones in approximately solid-body rotation at all times.…”
Section: X-rays From a Shear Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are several indications that the large-scale, external field can be reasonably assumed to be dipolar, with a moderate amount of twist in magnetars, the different mechanisms proposed for the generation of the internal field in the earlier phases of the NS life (differential rotation, dynamo, magneto-rotational instability) most likely give rise to both toroidal and poloidal components (e.g., Geppert et al 2004, 2006 andreferences therein). The presence of a toroidal field, roughly in equipartition with the poloidal one, is also required by general stability arguments (e.g., Braithwaite & Spruit 2006 and references therein). A further complication comes from the present poor knowledge of where the internal field resides.…”
Section: Magneto-rotational Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%