1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00564-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the moments and transition probability models in energy transfer processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must also be pointed out that the similarity of money and energy transfer processes as analysed in this work, makes worth a further comparative study on the evolution of the moments of the distribution [25].…”
Section: The Rate Of Money Transferencementioning
confidence: 80%
“…It must also be pointed out that the similarity of money and energy transfer processes as analysed in this work, makes worth a further comparative study on the evolution of the moments of the distribution [25].…”
Section: The Rate Of Money Transferencementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although the two methods of initial state preparation produce substantially different initial distributions, the energy transfer parameters obtained by our study are identical within experimental error. This result has previously been postulated from theoretical calculations, 10,11 but until now, no experimental work has substantiated this claim. This is the first direct experimental comparison between the two methods of initial excitation, and demonstrates that IRMPA is a viable method for energy transfer studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[3][4][5][6] Nevertheless, it has been shown theoretically that under appropriate conditions the results extracted from the data depend solely on the average excitation energy, i.e., they are independent of the initial distribution. 10,11 The average internal energy the excited molecule initially reaches after IRMPA is controlled by varying the fluence of the excitation laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Nevertheless, the average excitation energy is readily determined, and it has been shown that under appropriate conditions the results extracted from the data depend solely on this; i.e., they are independent of the initial distribution. 8,9 In a recent direct comparison of the UV and IRMPA methods of excitation in collisional energy-transfer studies, we have shown that for the same molecule and collider gas pair the two methods produce identical results within experimental error. 10 In the direct studies of large molecule collisional energy transfer, time-resolved monitoring of the energy content of the highly vibrationally excited molecules has been carried out using IRF or hot-band UV absorption spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The average internal energy the excited molecule initially reaches after IRMPA is controlled by varying the fluence of the excitation laser. The disadvantage in using IRMPA is the uncertainty in the initial energy distribution. , Nevertheless, the average excitation energy is readily determined, and it has been shown that under appropriate conditions the results extracted from the data depend solely on this; i.e., they are independent of the initial distribution. , In a recent direct comparison of the UV and IRMPA methods of excitation in collisional energy-transfer studies, we have shown that for the same molecule and collider gas pair the two methods produce identical results within experimental error …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%