2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.064504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of the phase diagram ofLaFeP1xAsxO1y

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
48
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In ref. [12], some of the present authors have shown that the variation of λ against the bond angle α exhibits a double dome feature as in Fig.2, which is consistent with the experimental observations 7,8,10 . There, the origin of the double dome structure has been explained as follows: superconductivity is suppressed when the bond angle is increased from α ∼ 110 because the hole Fermi surface around (π, π) originating from the d xy orbital vanishes.…”
Section: A Bond Angle Dependencesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In ref. [12], some of the present authors have shown that the variation of λ against the bond angle α exhibits a double dome feature as in Fig.2, which is consistent with the experimental observations 7,8,10 . There, the origin of the double dome structure has been explained as follows: superconductivity is suppressed when the bond angle is increased from α ∼ 110 because the hole Fermi surface around (π, π) originating from the d xy orbital vanishes.…”
Section: A Bond Angle Dependencesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, it was expected, from the empirical T c trend found by Lee et al 4 , that T c monotonically decreases by increasing the phosphorous content [4][5][6] . However, it has recently been revealed that another local maximum of T c (we will call this the second T c dome) exists in the high phosphorous content regime 7,8,10 . Moreover, for the non-fluorine-doped system, the antiferromagnetic phase sandwiched by the two superconducting phases were found in the finite P doping region [9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(d). On the other hand, the spectra for x=0.3 and 0.8 do not undergo such significant broadening even at low temperatures, providing evidence that both are in a x in which the re-emergent AFM-2 intervenes between the SC-1 at x < 0.4 (Wang et al 19 ) and the SC-2 at 0.7< x(Lai et al 11 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical studies have predicted that the 1111-type FeAs and FeP systems have different Fermi surface conditions depending on the local crystal structure around the Fe site [4]. Actually, our recent studies for RFeP 1−x As x (O,F) systems (R = La, Pr and Nd) have revealed that the transport properties in the normal state and the relationship between T c and the resistivity show anomalies around x = 0.6~0.8, indicating the two different Fermi surface states and the different SC mechanisms in RFeP(O,F) and RFeAs(O,F) [33,34]. These results also have suggested that the RFeP(O,F) and RFeAs(O,F) systems have different SC gap symmetries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%