RGS6 is a member of the RGS 1 protein family of which 20 or more genes exist in humans (1). From initial genetic studies in yeast implicating the RGS protein Sst2p in negative regulation of pheromone signaling, much evidence suggests RGS proteins may act to facilitate termination of heterotrimeric G protein signaling initiated by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors (2, 3). Indeed, the hallmark RGS domain, present in all RGS proteins, mediates their interaction with and enhancement of the intrinsic GTPase activity of heterotrimeric G protein ␣-subunits in vitro. Because G␣ subunits are active when bound to GTP, and form inactive complexes with cognate G␥ subunits following GTP hydrolysis, such actions of RGS proteins would shut down signaling by both active G␣ and G␥ signaling proteins. This activity would explain the enhancement of G protein signaling observed in genetic mutants lacking RGS proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans (4, 5). However, less is known about the signaling and physiological role of these proteins in mammals, although genetic knockout of RGS9 in mice showed that RGS9 is essential for acceleration of GTP hydrolysis by transducin (Gt) and normal recovery of the photoresponse (6).Yet, there are many unanswered questions regarding the structure and function of RGS proteins. Although some RGS proteins exhibit specificity toward specific G␣ subunits, the number of RGS proteins that exist far exceeds that of their presumed G protein targets. RGS proteins are predicted to accumulate at the plasma membrane to function as GAPs for G proteins, yet this evidence is lacking for all but a few RGS proteins. Indeed, we demonstrated localization of RGS proteins in the cytoplasm, nucleus, and Golgi and provided evidence for extra-RGS domain sequences in subcellular targeting of these proteins (7), and several other laboratories have reported localization of RGS proteins in the nucleus (8 -11). Also, considerable structural differences exist among members of the RGS family and distinct subfamilies of these proteins have been described (2, 3). These subfamilies share similarities both